Skip to comments.NOAA Temperature Adjustments Correlate Exactly with the Rise in CO2 - Big Surprise
Posted on 11/22/2016 8:17:11 AM PST by fireman15
Thermometers show the US cooling since about 1920, but NOAA massively cools the past to create the appearance of a warming trend.
These adjustments make a spectacular hockey stick of data tampering.
When plotted against atmospheric CO2, the correlation is almost perfect. NOAA is tampering with the data exactly to match their theory.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclimatescience.com ...
They’re a government agency, of course they’re going to lie about something.
In 1942, MGM produced a TRAVELTALKS movie short on Glacier and Waterton National Parks.
It was mentioned that the glaciers have been receding since the last ice age and “If there is no CLIMATIC CHANGE they will be gone in a thousand years.”
So, we have had REAL global warming for the last 12,000 years! And politicians really think they can stop the warming?
Besides, forty years ago we were warned of THE COMING ICE AGE!
MIT Prof Lindzen said it best when he described the “miraculous” coincidence that 100% of the “adjustments” move the data TO the theory.
I have seen the TRAVELTALKS short you are speaking of and I really enjoyed it. I had it recorded on my DVR for a long time because one of the museums my wife and I volunteer at has one of the busses that were shown in the short. The bus is fully restored.
There is a national park site called the Exit Glacier in Alaska. it is a major tourist site. As you wind up the road to the ark Head quarters and the actual glacier toe, there are signs indicating the location of the glacier toe at various times.
The earliest sign is dated 1896. The government has been plotting the receding glacier on the ground continuously or more than a hundred years.
The Trump administration should require that federal research dollars fund both sides of the debate equally.
That's like putting a humidifier and de-humidifier in the same room and letting them fight it out. Why not just fund neither and save the money?
Propaganda is not research. Why throw propaganda money at both sides? Why not just don’t spend money on propaganda?
I don’t have the link now, but either NOAA or Nasa ‘adjusted the readings’ of their satellite data when the data showed no warming for 20 years- claiming that one of their satellites was ‘out of alignment’ and claiming that the readings were ‘not correct as a result”
And they accuse us of being ‘anti-science’?
No wonder it is “settled science”!
Exactly, the actual historical record shows basically no warming in nearly 100 years and it is approximately 1/2F cooler than it was at the peak of the historical temperature record data from the 1930s.
Yes, “adjusting” the data to match your theory is so “scientific”.
The NOAA and all climate research grants are President Trump’s now.
The hoax that man is warming the planet has a short remaining life span.
Normally I agree. This time I do not agree both sides should be funded. We have 20 years of slanted research already, supporting the hoax. We don’t need any more. The next 8 years research grants should be given only to those who oppose the hoax. They should not falsify any data or conclusions. They should be real critical thinking scientists who are skeptical of any preconceived result.
But no, the AGW propagandists have had ample time and funds to spew their lies. Those exposing this hoax should get all of the grant money for the next 8 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.