[Blennos]

The Times denied that it had ever changed or attempted to change the ground rules for the meeting, saying that the paper had agreed to a small off-the-record portion of a larger conversation with columnists and reporters, which would be on the record.

The NY Times lies constantly. Why should we believe anything they say now? And failing? They are losing a lot of money, more and more each year. Isn't that a pretty good definition of "failing?"

[reformedliberal]

I read 97% of ad revenues gone and 6x the usual number of calls complaining about their election coverage.

But, Carlos has a checkbook, so they aren’t failing. They simply are not funding operations with current revenues.

Someone who like games should consider designing one titled “Parse the Press”. Use Pepe as a game avatar for Trump and the American People.

[ManHunter]

Oh c’mon, they ONLY lost $14 million, as reported in the first quarter of 2016...

[Fantasywriter]

The Left’s definition of ‘not failing’ is, ‘still writing fictional hit pieces on Trump and conservatives.’

By that metric the NYT is a raging success.