Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Krauthammer: Trump Can, Should Stop Funds to Sanctuary Cities
Newsmax ^ | 17 Nov 2016 | Joe Crowe

Posted on 11/17/2016 2:55:39 PM PST by mandaladon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: mandaladon

It would be really satisfying...and funny to see Rahm in handcuffs being loaded into a federal agency van for a trip to the slammer. There has to be some federal law to cover situations like this when “locals” defy/break federal law?


21 posted on 11/17/2016 3:27:06 PM PST by GoldenPup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Actually, Bill Clinton was pretty good about enforcing the border, at least here in Southern California. I remember when B.J. was president Border Patrol agents always boarded the Amtrak train in Capistrano and they always arrested illegals on the train. That stopped when Bush became president.


22 posted on 11/17/2016 3:30:33 PM PST by forgotten man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
It is going to be so great to watch as liberal city after city says they will give up federal money only to find out that the federal government actually stopped sending the checks.

Then the cities will say look at all the entitled people you have cut off from benefits? The Fed's better pretty forcefully say at that point, we didn't cut off the money, you disqualified these poor people. If they vote out the people who disqualified them or the people move to other cities, the money will be there for them.

23 posted on 11/17/2016 3:33:09 PM PST by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

It gets expensive to send a lot of illegals to So. America,etc. Maybe it would be a good idea to pick a few of these cities and start dropping thousands of them there as a true test of liberalism.


24 posted on 11/17/2016 3:35:09 PM PST by Mark (Obama Care is now DEMOCRAT CARE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Here is what the gimmegrants and islamos really think ...

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2206253/refugee-camp-translator-german-migrants-despise-christians-islamise-country/


25 posted on 11/17/2016 3:42:42 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forgotten man

I agree, when Clinton was President, there were regular raids on construction worksites rounding up illegal aliens, greatly discouraging builders from employing them here in Virginia.
As you said, that stopped when W. REDUCED interior and border enforcement AFTER 9/11, totally unforgivable in my book.


26 posted on 11/17/2016 3:46:06 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam , Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: libertylover

“You can’t have states and cities that don’t obey federal law.”

Not according to some Freepers, believe it or not. Some of the most recent comments on this issue are pretty sad.


27 posted on 11/17/2016 3:47:49 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mythenjoseph
A law passed in 1996 states that every state /county etc.... that accepts federal funds MUST comply with federal immigration laws 100% of the time.

Amazing. And it hasn't been enforced since the day it was signed twenty years ago.

That's about to change.

28 posted on 11/17/2016 3:51:04 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

These cities all get lots of grants from DoJ and DHS. Start with cutting all those and work up from there.


29 posted on 11/17/2016 3:56:19 PM PST by USNBandit (Sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Honey Badger don’t give a sh|t what the traitorous, neo-con, nevertrump, hillary supporter has to say about anything ever again .


30 posted on 11/17/2016 4:30:27 PM PST by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

There are only a few things the Federal government should actually be doing and one is protecting our border. You don’t see anyone her saying PE Trump should use the Feds to enforce EPA, GUN, EDUCATION, HEALTH laws etc. This is one issue these idiots in the Federal government should be doing and it’s the one thing they DONT. Instead they’re busy sticking their nose into law abiding citizen’s lives.


31 posted on 11/17/2016 4:33:49 PM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

W encouraged it, way beyond just tolerating it. He pushed for amnesty and only the patriots in the house at that time stopped it. I don’t think the current house would do so.


32 posted on 11/17/2016 4:38:12 PM PST by Hardens Hollow (Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Listen up Kraut. Saying the Democrats have “tolerated” sanctuary cities is disingenuous to put it mildly. Why be deceptive? Why don’t you be honest and admit that the Democrats originated the idea of sanctuary cities and have promoted this for years? Stop being so dishonest, you creep.


33 posted on 11/17/2016 5:01:58 PM PST by fortes fortuna juvat (The UN is an anti-American cabal dominated by tin-pot dictators.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Emergencyawesome

HA! Spot on.
Thanks Chuckie. Now go away.


34 posted on 11/17/2016 5:37:09 PM PST by MotorCityBuck ( Keep the change, you filthy animal! ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

How much money can Trump save withholding funds from the Sanctuary cities that he can put towards building the wall...?


35 posted on 11/17/2016 6:39:46 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Kram it Krauthammer


36 posted on 11/17/2016 7:19:58 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (these protestors are not anarchists. They are Hillary Supporting Demoncraps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

2018 elections for the House are not that far away. We should be careful how we frame this to minimize losses of House seats. Of course, it depends on how many of those seats we need to defend are in districts which include these cities.


37 posted on 11/17/2016 8:25:09 PM PST by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

No, it should be used to reduce the deficit. Seize the property of illegals being deported and auction it off to pay for the wall.


38 posted on 11/17/2016 8:28:34 PM PST by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

On Lou Dobbs today, he put up a graphic saying $650 Billion in funding to sanctuary cities could be cut off. It would be interesting to see what that figure includes. Maybe all welfare programs ?


39 posted on 11/17/2016 8:35:58 PM PST by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Withholding federal funds is simply too passive an approach.

The Feds should levy a head tax for every illegal the locality refuses to surrender, plus charge a premium for the cost of identifying and deporting unlawful residents found in their district.

There's got to be a big penalty for encouraging opposition to the immigration law.

It used to be that a legal immigrant ot resident alien needed to have a sponsor financially liable for their presence, IIRC.

40 posted on 11/17/2016 8:43:39 PM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson