Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Newt Gingrich confirms he won’t be in a Donald Trump cabinet
mcclatchydc.com ^ | 11/17/16 | Kevin G. Hall

Posted on 11/17/2016 10:33:18 AM PST by ColdOne

WASHINGTON

Mentioned as a possible pick to head the departments of State or Defense, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich won’t serve in the Trump administration, he confirmed to McClatchy on Thursday.

“I will not be the cabinet,” Gingrich said, adding that “I intend to be focused on strategic planning.”

Gingrich did not say whether the decision was his or whether his long ties to official Washington effectively disqualified him from joining President-elect Donald Trump’s administration.

(Excerpt) Read more at mcclatchydc.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: newt; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2016 10:33:18 AM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Here’s how I read it.

The Donald is going to work his Cabinet Officials asses off. They will be there to pursue his agenda, not the Republicans or their own.


2 posted on 11/17/2016 10:35:22 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie (NoHellary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I wonder if it is because he is talking too much. Trump has, I believe, placed an absolute gag order on discussing what is going on in the selection process.


3 posted on 11/17/2016 10:35:37 AM PST by Pilgrim's Progress (http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I think that’s a good thing. Newt’s very smart, and should be advising. But, he’s getting along in years, and might find direct administration exhausting.

He also has a big ego which seems to swell and cause trouble when he has direct power. His original “Contract with America” was brilliant, but several years later, his star had fallen dramatically as far as the public was concerned.


4 posted on 11/17/2016 10:35:45 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Makes sense. Newt about 95% reliable...but every so often he goes off on one of his “On the Couch With Nancy Pelosi” moments.

It’s best to use him sparingly.


5 posted on 11/17/2016 10:38:05 AM PST by Preston Manning (When standing on the edge of a cliff, a "giant step forward" is NOT progress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

“I will not be the cabinet,” Gingrich said, adding that “I intend to be focused on strategic planning.”

Newt has been saying this for awhile now. Nothing new here for anyone that has been playing attention.


6 posted on 11/17/2016 10:41:00 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

FABULOUS!!


7 posted on 11/17/2016 10:42:03 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I think Gingrich would have been a better choice than any of the other names being bandied about for Secretary of State. But I’m assuming it was a mutual decision.


8 posted on 11/17/2016 10:43:38 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Twen Hcirgnig

Yes, everything is there to make a great Newt Gingrich.

Sadly, too often what he is comes out jumbled.

When that happens, policy gets harder to pass, the press has a field day, and the jerks on the Left point to him saying even people on our side agree with them.

Ahhhhh, no thanks.

Trump is one smart cookie


9 posted on 11/17/2016 10:44:13 AM PST by DoughtyOne (The morning and the evening were the election day. People voted. The Lord saw, and it was good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
I dunno, I think Newt was at his absolute best when he was the force behind the contract with America, that big, sweeping vision that ended up crippling the Clinton presidency. Running the department of agriculture or something is for an able admistrator, not a guy like Newt.

Newt's talent is for strategy and vision and getting it through congress; if he can focus that towards Trumps agenda and not his own he could be great in such a role. Which, by the way, he's been saying he wants since the day after the election. Not a cabinet post.

I know Newt is a bit of a loose cannon but the outrage he showed Megyn Kelly when she called Trump a sexual predator was real and I think Trump appreciated that loyalty immensely. I doubt he'll set Newt adrift like he did Christie. The question is what will he ask him to do?

10 posted on 11/17/2016 10:46:14 AM PST by pepsi_junkie (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Newt is a big idea man rather than an administering bureaucrat. He’d be much more useful helping to formulate legislation and strategies for getting it enacted rather than dealing with department red tape.


11 posted on 11/17/2016 10:46:14 AM PST by LiveFree99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Newt is a strategic thinker, not a cabinet secretary.


12 posted on 11/17/2016 10:46:26 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

He made it clear that he will not have lobbyists in his cabinet.


13 posted on 11/17/2016 10:47:37 AM PST by Hildy ("The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it." Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Have him run a Department that will be eliminated in 2 years. Education? Energy? State(put it UNDER t e Defense Department.


14 posted on 11/17/2016 10:48:30 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
There is no way in hell that the head of an agency can devote much time to "Strategic Thought" when dealing with the day to day demands of managing the agency AND answering to the demands of Congress!

Trump needs strategic planners who are free to propose changes and actively promote them for him! An entirely different group from administrators! Been there, seen that, under Reagan!

15 posted on 11/17/2016 10:48:43 AM PST by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

True, and remember - running a cabinet-level bureaucracy is a huge administrative job. Not the place for a big-picture innovative thinker and strategist.


16 posted on 11/17/2016 10:48:45 AM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I hope Trump leaves out all the inside the beltway people from his cabinet, and for the most part, from his inner circle. We have to have fresh faces, and fresh ideas, not just recycled neo-con talking points or globalist BS spewers, or PC spewers.


17 posted on 11/17/2016 10:53:57 AM PST by euram
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Trump is also going to make them sign a promise not to lobby for five years after they leave.


18 posted on 11/17/2016 10:55:44 AM PST by Mercat (Men never do evil so fully and cheerfully as when they do it out of conscience.” (Blaise Pascal))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I think this might be due to the ban on the connection to lobbyists. Remember Newt got slammed by PAC’s about this when he ran for president.


19 posted on 11/17/2016 11:00:12 AM PST by Madam Theophilus (iI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

I don’t care to place him in a position like that, after which he’ll talk about his accomplishment, never attributing it to, or even grasping it was truly Donald Trump that had accomplished it.


20 posted on 11/17/2016 11:02:04 AM PST by DoughtyOne (The morning and the evening were the election day. People voted. The Lord saw, and it was good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson