One reporter said that it is important for the pressto always be with the President because tge presswas there when JFK and Reagan were shot
The fools really have no end of stupidity. Any student of history knows LBJ got laws passed by waving JFKs bloody shirt that JFK himself could never have gotten. If they could get Trump assassinated the result would very likely produce an even WORSE outcome for them than patiently waiting eight years like we did for the Klown.
Help me with the logic here. My analytic mind has just gone areel. Since the press was present when JFK and Reagan were shot, that would mean that their presence didn't stop these horrific occurrences.
Combine that historical fact with the open hostility of the press toward Trump. One would logically conclude that that press could in fact serve as a conduit of information about the itinerary of the President.
Perhaps Trump should keep the press pool away from him, until his team approves of who's there. Eeeee....yikes! It's too early in the AM to apply logic to what CNN says.
;-)
Megan Kelly said yesterday how important it was for the 1st amendment that reporters be with the President at all times (why it was wrong for Trump to go eat steak with his family alone) because if the press (cess)pool wasn’t with Reagan when he was shot they would not have captured it all on camera. Never-mind that Trump was going to dinner whereas Reagan was giving a speech in his capacity as President. What she was really saying is that the press has to be there when Trump gets attacked, it will be great for ratings.
Coincidence?
I heard that also and noticed their choice of examples...absolutely criminal.
“One reporter said that it is important for the pressto always be with the President because tge presswas there when JFK and Reagan were shot.”
That “reporter” has more interest in getting first dibs on a hot scoop. Has no relation whatsoever to security. If anything, the slimeballs get in the way and muck everything up.