No. California would have 55, but the 49% crowd in California wouldn’t be completely disenfranchised.
I think we need to keep Dems on the defensive. They are all about one person/ one vote and don’t disenfranchise voters. So they can agree not to do that here and allow Californians the chance to be represented in the Electoral College proportional to their vote.
Whereupon, they will go one step further -- to a popular vote nationally, the ultimate expression of "one man, one vote".
In other words, that argument isn't convincing.