Posted on 11/16/2016 1:38:49 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
TORONTO, November 15, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) — Refusing to use a transgendered person’s chosen name, preferred pronoun such as “ze” or “xer,” or “purposely misgendering” them is discrimination and could be liable to fines, says Ontario Human Rights Commission chief commissioner Renu Mandhane.
But that’s “utter, complete nonsense,” REAL Women’s Gwen Landolt told LifeSiteNews.
Mandhane is “trying to intimate to get people to conform to her politically correct mindset,” Landolt added. “Nobody should be intimidated by them.”
Indeed, the apparent intended subject of Mandhane’s remarks, University of Toronto psychology professor Jordan Peterson, does not appear to be at all intimidated, Landolt noted.
Mandhane “weighed in” on Peterson’s ongoing campaign against political correctness at the request of the Toronto Sun.
The psychology professor has stated he won’t use the neologistic pronouns referring to various genders and that the university, provincial and federal directives that would force him to do so are unprecedented attacks on free speech.
The university has sent Peterson a disciplinary letter suggesting he stop speaking on the subject and stating that his refusal to use the pronouns was contrary to the rights of transgendered students.
And now Mandhane, whose remarks were published in the Sun on Sunday, asserted the same:
Refusing to address a trans person by their chosen name and a personal pronoun that matches their gender identity, or purposely misgendering, is discrimination when it takes place in a social area covered by the Code (employment, housing, and services like education).
She also stated:
The OHRC recognizes the right to freedom of expression under the Charter. However, lawmakers and courts have found that no right is absolute. Expression may be limited where it is hate speech under criminal law; or amounts to harassment, discrimination, or creates a poisoned environment under the Code.
Mandhane told the Sun that the OHRC “does not require any particular gender-neutral pronoun. If in doubt, ask the person how they wish to be addressed. Use ‘they’ if you don’t know. Or simply use their chosen name.”
Asked about possible penalties, Mandhane told the Sun: “Organizations have a legal duty to take positive steps to prevent and respond to discrimination. A tribunal or court may order financial or other remedies.”
LifeSiteNews was not able to reach Peterson by deadline, but REAL Women’s Landolt stated that the Human Rights Commission is “getting crazier and crazier.”
She noted Mandhane’s grounds of “creating a poisoned environment” is open to wide interpretation. “Who determines that except the politically correct people in the Human Rights Commission?”
Peterson launched three videos objecting to the climate of repression caused by federal and provincial anti-discrimination laws, including the Trudeau Liberals’ Bill C-16, which was approved in committee without public hearings and now needs only third reading to pass.
Ontario’s Bill 379 amended the Human Rights Code to add transgenderism as prohibited grounds for discrimination in 2012, and followed in June 2015 with Bill 77, Affirming Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Act, which bans psychotherapy to minors for homosexuality or gender dysphoria, and bans government funding for such therapy for adults under the Ontario Health Insurance Plan.
Landolt pointed out in an earlier REAL Women statement that federal justice minister Jody Wilson-Raybould “admitted at the Committee Hearing [on Bill C-16] that she had no actual evidence or data on whether transsexuals were actually experiencing discrimination or hate, but was only relying on information provided to her from partisan transgender and LGBT activists.”
Also, it was clear “that no one understood the meaning of the expressions ‘gender identity’ and ‘gender expression’ that were supposed to be protected by these amendments, Landolt noted.
Similarly, Mandhane cited no data to support her statement that “transgender people routinely experience discrimination, harassment and violence, which significantly affects their health and well-being.”
She wrote the “Code and case law” requires that “organizations must respect a trans person’s right to be treated in accordance with their lived gender identity.”
After Peterson’s videos went viral, transgender groups vilified him, and he was targeted at a protest. Protesters disrupted an October 11 free speech rally in his defense, drowning Peterson out with heckling and a “white noise”machine.
However, Peterson is scheduled to take part in a University of Toronto debate on “Bill C-16 and gender provisions of the Ontario Human Rights Code” on November 19, from 9:30 a.m. to 11 a.m., at the Sandford Fleming Building, 10 King’s College Road. Tickets will be available through UofTtix as of Tuesday, Nov. 15, at 11 a.m.
The Queer Caucus of CUPE 3902, which represents “7,000 sessional lecturers, TAs, and other contract instructional staff at U of T,” has called for a boycott of the debate.
Peterson has stated he is willing to go to jail, be fined, and lose his job rather than use politically-correct gender pronouns.
The Trump election was the perfect answer to this type of political correctness.
Canada needs to grow a pair or bow on bended knee to their speech code masters—their call.
I probably wouldn’t talk to snowflakes by choice.
Canada is going down the tubes fast lately. I think they need a reset because obviously the weirdos have risen up in power over there too. It’s too coincidental that this phenomenon is occurring worldwide. Someone is pushing it hard to rot people’s brains so they can’t think for themselves anymore IMO....
This interferes with freedom of speech and conscience, and also mandates that the English language must be changed based on any number of made up “pronouns” that people with mental illness or showboating political agendas insist on being used.
We have no rights in Canada if we are law abiding, morally upright citizens. We have “privileges” that can be revoked at the whim of our political elites. “Rights” are preserved for criminals, perverts, muslims, and anyone who chooses to attack Christians.
At a lecture I gave a few years ago, I called on an obviously confused person with a question as “the Prius driver in pink”.
That person thought it was cool: “I just got my Prius last week, how did you know?” I think the Prius fan was male, barely, but I’m not certain.
If we can’t use real pronouns or legal names, perhaps we can refer to them all as “Prius drivers”.
I demand they use the pronoun “Your Majesty” when referring to me.
Let’s get this nonsense over with quickly.
But would it be OK to ask them what they would like to be called: How would you like me to address you? Twink/sissy/carpet muncher/fudge packer/etc.....
Liberals are evil.
In the US, where I could see someone wanting this, you could claim a language disability—you speak Old Pronoun English, and have difficulty learning and applying this new grammatical doctrine. I know I would.
I think a lot of this stupid shit will go away under President Trump.
Absolutely..!! Satan stays up all night thinking of ways to mess with our minds...
Hey- You works for me
I want to be referred to as "Master." It's the pronoun my grandmother used to refer to me when I was a young boy and I'd like to stick with it. I'll also forego the surname and just be referred to by the pronoun alone.
Another good choice!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.