Posted on 11/13/2016 6:27:04 AM PST by rktman
On the campaign trail, Trump, a Republican, backed more fossil fuel production in the U.S. and vowed to “cancel” the Paris agreement. He has repeatedly suggested that climate change is a hoax. His Democratic challenger Hillary Clinton, in contrast, has called for urgent action on climate change.
There in a nutshell you have the difference between the two challengers for the Presidency of the United States of America.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Hillarys urgent action was shutting down US coal
Guess they shut her down instead
Feeling warm and toasty .... For now
“Climate change” is an important issue to no one outside of academia and the media. The economy is, on the other hand, joined at the hip to availability of affordable energy. Thank God our new President understands this.
The Global Warming scam is fake environmentalism and a globalist plot for oppressing the people on behalf of the rich.
That voice. I’m so done with that voice.
My assumption on this issue is that there will be a three fold test before there is any policy either way (as it should have been all along): a) is it really happening without all the pseudo-science? b) if so, who can prove if it is indeed man caused? c) what in the world could be done about it if both were true?
It reeks of Act-Up and AIDS back in the day.....
At this point, I really don’t care what Hillary would have done about anything. She’s irrelvant.
Why write an article referencing Hillary.
She does not exist anymore.
On the campaign trail, Trump, a Somethin, backed more fossil fuel production in the U.S. and vowed to “cancel” the Paris agreement. He has repeatedly suggested that climate change is a hoax. His Despotic challenger Hillary Clinton, in contrast, has called for urgent action on climate change and has even taken to the trail with fake and coincidental encounters with those who have supported her for many years and can suddenly take healthy hikes, despite very recent bouts of uncontrollable fits of coughing, many times being unable to walk more than a few feet without the assistance of an orderly and pretending to be otherwise healthy enough to get out of bed.
LOL! Either one. The screeching or the whistle on the lyin’ king’s “s’s”. Odd how either one of them can instantly change their inflection to match the audience to sound more approachable and down to erf huh? ‘Pander bearing’ at it finest.
“Feeling warm and toasty .... For now”
You forgot one question: Is it necessarily bad?
It might be fantastic, allowing us to grow more more food, PlanetSide. These @ssholes NEVER consider this.
I care what the Wicked Witch would have done: it is an infallible guide to what NOT to do. Do the opposite, and you have great policy. This topic is the perfect example of this.
Man-made "climate change" isn't just a hoax, it total and complete bullshi'ite.
Oh yeah, and all that carbon in the atmosphere? It's making trees grow faster.
Another benefit of climate change and increased CO2 – trees continue to grow at a faster rate
Ah, yes...more trees for guitars, gun stocks, houses, campfires, etc.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho! God Bless Texas!
Almost completely off topic, but the following question sure doesn’t merit another Vanity. I sure hope somebody can point me in the right direction.
Ahem...
Mannequins? In phone booths? Que what??? Kankle’s Krack Kindergartener Kampaign Krew used mannequins somewhere to fill up empty space?
Somehow I missed this story and can’t find any reference to it. Thanks for the pixels and any help.
Hopefully, yo’ momma’s admonition will come true to those participants and they well freeze that way. LOL! ‘Specially the anti-murican “protestors’ out there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.