[a fool in paradise]

NYet times isn’t updating their election map and is refusing to acknowledge Michigan and Arizona...

http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/president

[canalabamian]

“NY[et] times isn’t updating their election map”

I was wondering when they would get around to doing that. They’ve moved Clinton up to 228, but Trump remains at 279. Denial runs strong.

[ArtDodger]

By not showing Trump with a total of 306 electoral votes, they gain an extremely shallow win, maybe the only one they will have for a long time. As in everything else that liberals do, all portrayals are a facade to hide the truth.

[Freee-dame]

They did manage to change the map on Minnesota though. If the winner had been a Dem, we would be seeing all kinds of stories about the winner’s childhood, successes, humanity, etc. Somehow they can’t find any of these worthy of showing. I hate the MSM and, at least, am enjoying watched them eat crow.

[martinidon]

AZ still has 650K absentee ballots to count. They verify signatures before they open the ballot. You would think they would have been doing that as they came in. Trump will win AZ but I guess with that many ballots not counted they wait. It will take a couple of days to get them counted.

[Nifster]

Neither is the WSJ

Cowards and liars all

[mmichaels1970]

NYet times isn’t updating their election map and is refusing to acknowledge Michigan and Arizona...

The do have Trump "projected" to win 306 electorals though. And I've gotta say that their interactive map was one of the best I've seen for following the voting. I'm giving them kudos for that.

But they are still a terrible commie-propagandist outlet.

[FlipWilson]

And if isn’t like he squeaked by in Arizona.

[Twinkie]

SPOILED BRATS THROWING A TANTRUM!! MSM is DEAD to me!!