[digger48]

Any other states have anything like this in their Constitution?

[Battle Axe]

Why do they have to say that?

When I had the ice cream parlor, I gave a pint of ice cream, any flavor, to any hunter that could prove the killed one of those dang bambies.

I'm out there delivering pizza and ice cream on the road at night and those crazy things are all over the road. I even advertised that if you killed one with your car, you got ice cream.

There has to be DNR paperwork if you kill one with your car, I guess so it can be counted.

[Repeal 16-17]

The people have a right, which includes the right to use traditional methods, to hunt, fish, and harvest wildlife, subject only to the laws prescribed by the General Assembly and rules prescribed by virtue of the authority of the General Assembly to: (1) promote wildlife conservation and management; and (2) preserve the future of hunting and fishing.

So you have this right, except when the State legislature says otherwise. Isn't this true even without this amendment?

[grame]

Why don’t they say it in normal speak, not legislative language? Many times I get confused by the language, I know how I want to vote but the wording confuses me.

This is confusing because it seems like a question you wouldn’t need to ask. Wonder why there is a need for this.

[Gasshog]

Bump!

[FamiliarFace]

Some Hoosier help me out here. I’m new to the state and not familiar with the constitution of Indiana. I don’t understand what this is asking me. I may abstain because I don’t get it.