Why Trump? Look at Europe (Rush: why Corruptocrats require a permanent underclass = open borders)

Rush Limbaugh ^ | November 4, 2016 | Rush Limbaugh

[Perseverando]

Snip:

The real reason that left-wing Democrats, which is about all there are anymore, are so in favor of open borders is this. The Democrat Party politically, for its enduring power and thus survival, needs a permanent underclass of people dependent on government. And the fastest way to get them is to bring them here from poor nations when they're young, when they're uneducated and unskilled and can't work and thus they arrive totally dependent.

And if this happens with a Democrat in the White House, they are going to grow very accustomed to the government of the United States taking care of them. As they learn who the government is, i.e., it's Obama and Democrats, they become Democrat voters. And that's the reason they support it. It's not compassion. It's actually the opposite of compassion. They want poor and uneducated, low-skill people to come into the country and stay that way. That's the trick. They want them to stay ill-educated. They want them to stay lower middle class to poor.

They don't want them earning a lot of money. They don't ever want them becoming independent. It's hideous. It's the exact opposite of compassion, why the Democrat Party is in favor of open borders. And the more of those circumstances that exist, the better. The less English they speak, the better. The more dependent on government they are, the better. Because the Democrats then look at them as really just a giant, unregistered voting block waiting to be registered.

[Perseverando]

This is one of the best, clear and concise explanations of why the Corruptocrats (Republican & Democrat) want illegal immigration in America.

Rush also addresses immigration in Eurabia.

[Oldexpat]

What’s the point of being a rich oligarch if you don’t have servants to take care of your EVERY need?

[Olog-hai]

The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationality.

The working men have no country. We cannot take from them what they have not got. Since the proletariat must first of all acquire political supremacy, must rise to be the leading class of the nation, must constitute itself the nation, it is so far itself national, though not in the bourgeois sense of the word.

National differences and antagonism between peoples are daily more and more vanishing, owing to the development of the bourgeoisie, to freedom of commerce, to the world market, to uniformity in the mode of production and in the conditions of life corresponding thereto. …

The source of this twisted “open borders” philosophy.

[lodi90]

Thanks Rush. Better late than never.