Posted on 11/05/2016 9:23:19 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
1942, Canada passes anti-NAZI expressions...
Would have been equally brilliant
“Phobia” means fear. How do you outlaw fear? “You will not be afraid! YOU WILL NOT!!” That’s ridiculous.
Does this mean that Trump will need to build a wall on the Northern border too?
They are able to whittle their way into any, and all, governments and make it illegal to say or do? anything about muslims crimes and terrorism?
Even rape and ‘honor killings’ are cultural differences that should not lead to jail time?
Soon they will fine people for have dogs, alcohol and bacon in public places?
An article about a motion being passed.
Where is the text of the motion?
Elections have consequences.
Yeah? Good for them. Who cares?
Are they nuts? Go ahead aqnd flood your country with them. See what happens. They’re schizoid murderers, pathological liars, and untrustworthy as hell. Why in the hell would you stand with them? Didn’t you learn anything from France you idiots?
I know this for sure, as I do observe the television media in Canada. Well..... trust Free Republic to have jihad watch to tell the story. As for the male members of the Liberal Party, I would like to advise.
Get your elegant bottoms up in the air. (Chuckle).
And then they'll have to do all over again in French.
Google “muslim excused for rape”
This is helping me make my decision to move to the US with my company to western PA.
So when does Quebec secede?
Government protecting the invaders
Rape-o-phobia
Murderphobia
Robberphobia
GSC, this is not an act. It is a motion. An indication of their feelings. It is not law.
As far as I can tell, this motion is just a feel-good magic unicorn sort of thing and has no legal force. If the government makes the mistake of trying to turn this into a law, then I would expect the opposition to use that to their advantage, and if it got to be a law then it would meet with resistance all the way to an eventual Supreme Court challenge. I would think it would be too vague a concept to litigate, better to leave things alone and prosecute people for acts rather than opinions. This government has made no move (yet) to restore the widely criticized Section 13 of the Human Rights Act which gave grounds for prosecution of opinions, overturned by the previous government a few years into their first mandate. If that comes back into discussion then it would give a parallel legal track for prosecuting Islamophobia, so we remain on high alert for any appearance of that old canard.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.