Posted on 11/02/2016 6:15:15 AM PDT by detective
The Pew Research Center released a report last week based on information from the National Center for Health Statistics on birth rates in the United States. Data found within the report could raise concerns over both the economic and cultural ramifications of the birth rates of foreign-born mothers in the United States. According to the report, "In 2014, about 275,000 babies were born to unauthorized-immigrant parents in the United States, accounting for about seven percent of all U.S. births, and 32 percent of all U.S. births to foreign-born mothers."
While that figure represents a decline in the number of babies born to unauthorized immigrants in the United States, the economic impact of these children is significant, as illegal families are granted access to welfare programs through their U.S.-born children, known as anchor babies.
Last year, in an analysis of 2009 census data, National Review reported that 71 percent of illegal-alien-headed households with children received some sort of welfare, compared with 39 percent of native-headed households. Furthermore, children of illegals are granted access to public schools, which can cost approximately $160,000 per pupil for a K-12 public school education, based on an average yearly cost of $12,300 per student.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
"Some immigrant groups seek to bring to America the very cultures whose failures led them to flee to this country. Not all individual immigrants and not all immigrant groups. But too many Americans have become so gullible that they are afraid to even get the facts about which immigrants have done well and improved America, and which have become a burden that can drag us all down."
But you must embrace this, and if you don’t you are a racist. You can be cleansed of the racism taint by voting for Hillary, who wants even more diversity, and less borders, and fewer Americans.
IIRC, Trump is going to end anchor babies.
The best way to handle the problem is to repeal the 14th Amendment. Since all former slaves are now deceased. The amendment is no longer needed.
“babies were born to unauthorized-immigrant parents in the United States”
Unauthorized = illegal immigrants
You can help: |
Right-click this image and save it. Post it on your Facebook, Twitter and other social media accounts. Send a copy to your Senators and Reps right now and whenever you communicate with them. When you get fundraising solicitations, include a copy in your reply. Send copies to your friends and family and ask them to do likewise. Spread it everywhere. |
and her
America repents for having neglected our Lord and FOUNDER and turns again unto HIM for guidance, knowledge and Wisdom.
TRUMP AFFECT
Democrats/Liberals are so ignorant (whether willfully, or naturally) in their understanding of our Constitution they lie when explaining “Anchor Baby”. There is NO SUCH THING as an anchor baby which any illegal drops on America’s doorstep. The children should be sent home with their parents, post haste.
Wise up, defeaters of our Constitution or forever be branded as the imbeciles you are.
Hijra, or Hegira, i.e., invasion by migration works. It works especially well if the hosts are stupid enough to provide generous welfare, which increases the reproduction rate of the invading parasites relative to the hard-working (”deplorable”) hosts.
Obama well knows this, and supports it heavily.
Also called, by me, “the cuckoo strategy.” Get others to provide the means to raise your progeny.
This can’t be true. The Democrats told us the illegal invaders were a net gain to the economy.
BFL . . .
Not allowing anchor babies US citizenship should be at the top of Trump’s list.
They have to leave.
“But too many Americans have become so gullible that they are afraid to even get the facts about which immigrants have done well and improved America, and which have become a burden that can drag us all down.”
“IIRC, Trump is going to end anchor babies.
The best way to handle the problem is to repeal the 14th Amendment. Since all former slaves are now deceased. The amendment is no longer needed.”
However, you can simply have Congress pass a law, and President Trump sign it, stating that the US will not exercise jurisdiction, for purposes of the 14th Amendment, over the children of non-residents or illegal residents. End of anchor babies in 5 minutes.
You forgot prison terms, followed by immediate and permanent deportation, for ANY non-citizen who even registers to vote, let alone votes, in any election in this country.
“This cant be true. The Democrats told us the illegal invaders were a net gain to the economy.”
That might work.
The first amendment starts, “Congress shall make no law...” The USSC invented the Incorporation Doctrine in 1925 to make the states subject to the BOR—by distorting the 14th amendment. But the second amendment does not begin “Congress shall make no law..” I.e., no need for the incorporation doctrine to make the 2A apply to the states. Just as no state has been permitted to violate the 4A or the 5A, even before the incorporation doctrine.
It’s not necessary to repeal that portion of the 14th. We just have to enforce it as it was intended to be enforced, instead of allowing `rats to use it as an `All-y all-y in come free!” mechanism.
http://www.14thamendment.us/birthright_citizenship/original_intent.html
“This understanding was reaffirmed by Senator Edward Cowan, who stated:
“[A foreigner in the United States] has a right to the protection of the laws; but he is not a citizen in the ordinary acceptance of the word...”
“The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” was intended to exclude American-born persons from automatic citizenship whose allegiance to the United States was not complete. With illegal aliens who are unlawfully in the United States, their native country has a claim of allegiance on the child.”
Mexico recognizes dual citizenship but has no `statutory rape’ laws.
Muck Fexico!
PS It’s a great `rat scam, too, because once Chinese, Mexican, central American and other cowbirds manage to evade our immigration laws and drop their eggs in our nest, they can then say,
“You wouldn’t tear a child from the arms of its parents, would you?” So, “anchors”.
They don’t have a problem with tearing babies from their mothers’ bodies, but have the brass to make this specious argument.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.