Posted on 11/01/2016 11:44:04 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
USS ‘Zumwalt.’ Photo via Wikipedia
On Oct. 15, 2016 in Baltimore on the U.S. East Coast, the U.S. Navy commissioned the guided-missile destroyer USS Zumwalt into service following a protracted and costly development.
Six hundred feet long and displacing 14,500 tons, Zumwalt — the first of three stealthy land-attack destroyers — is America’s largest surface combatant in generations.
But she’s not alone in her weight class. While the Americans were celebrating Zumwalt’s entry into service, on the other side of the world at a shipyard in Shanghai, the Chinese navy was hard at work on its own 14,000-ton-displacement surface warship.
The Type 055 just began major construction and probably won’t enter service before 2018. But when she does, she could be the biggest and most powerful surface warship in Asia.
It’s unclear exactly what the Type 055 will do, but indications are that she’ll function as the main air-defense escort for China’s new domestically-built aircraft carrier, currently under construction at Dalian in northern China.
Consider the Type 055’s superstructure facets, apparently meant to support radar emitters similar to the SPY-1 emitters that are part of the U.S. Navy’s Aegis air-defense system. U.S. Navy flattops never go anywhere without at least one Aegis-equipped cruiser and several Aegis destroyers as escorts. Zumwalt, notably, is the first new major American surface combatant class in 30 years not to have Aegis.
The Type 055 likely won’t be a direct competitor of Zumwalt. Rather than integrating Zumwalt and her two sisters into carrier battle groups, the U.S. Navy will probably deploy the giant destroyers on solo cruises near land in order to take advantage of the vessels’ radar-evading hull-form and their twin, 155-millimeter guns, which can fire projectiles a distance of at least 80 miles in order to support amphibious landings and special operations.
Errymath art
The apparent differences between the Type 055 and the Zumwalt class are stark.
The Type 055 boasts a fairly traditional hull-form and superstructure, with only modest attempts to reduce radar-signature by way of an enclosed forward deck, an angular front superstructure and an enclosed main mast.
By contrast, Zumwalt is stealthy from the keel up, with a distinctive downward-sloping “tumblehome” hull and fully enclosed sensors and gun turrets. Arguably, Zumwalt and her sisters have greater need of stealth, as they could sail alone and close to enemy shores.
Assuming the Type 055 is indeed primarily an air-defense ship, she could travel in close company with a carrier, other escort vessels and even logistics ships, none of which are particularly stealthy.
Building stealth into the Type 055 would represent an inefficient use of resources — assuming China’s naval architects are even capable of designing a ship as stealthy as Zumwalt is.
The Type 055 reportedly boasts 128 vertical launch cells for anti-air missiles and other munitions — six cells more than the U.S. Navy’s own most heavily-armed surface warships, the venerable Ticonderoga-class cruisers.
Zumwalt carries just 80 cells. These are arrayed along the edges of Zumwalt’s hull — the idea being that missile cells can also function as “armor,” partially absorbing the force of a missile or gun hit. The Type 055 apparently carries her own missiles in centrally-installed clusters, like the Ticonderogas and most other warships do.
Zumwalt’s designers traded missile capacity for durability. The Type 055’s originators stuck to traditional design principles, maximizing firepower at the cost of damage-resistance.
In many ways, the Type 055 is evolutionary rather than revolutionary. Largely conventional in form and function, the Type 055’s major innovation is, simply put, her size.
Zumwalt, on the other hand, pushes the boundaries of warship-design and could potentially open up new operational concepts. Not since the age of the battleship have navies deployed large warships close to enemy shores for the purposes of bombarding targets on land. Radars and guided missiles made the mission too dangerous for today’s flimsy, easy-to-detect surface combatants.
The Type 055 will probably do for China what the Aegis cruisers and destroyers — nearly 100 of them — are already doing for the United States. That is, protecting the carriers. Zumwalt, however, could make near-shore fire support possible again — a feat the Type 055 surely can’t duplicate.
It could turn out that sheer size is the only meaningful characteristic America and China’s respective 14,000-ton surface warships have in common.
Ours is real and theirs is a drawing?
LOL
Perhaps the article has different sources. Wikipedia puts the Chinese destroyer at 10,000 tons (versus 14,000 for the Z). Cost difference is notable. $7.5 billon versus $750 million.
The stealthiness of the Z would be betrayed if operated as part of a carrier strike group, or if accompanied by a resupply ship. It is, therefore, something of a boutique (limited mission) weapon system.
With this fiasco and the fiasco of the Littoral Combat Ship, our Navy finds itself with an aging inventory of (conventional) destroyers, frigates and other smaller warships.
This is similar to the problem of our Air Force, having sunk so much money in the F-35, also a boutique weapon system, leaving us with an aging fleet of fighters and ground support aircraft.
DoD procurement usually leaves a lot to be desired, but the money we are pouring down rat holes has now reached the level of jeopardizing our nation’s defense.
What China is missing is 300 years of naval experience. That’s really hard to fabricate. That’s what got the Soviets in the end. All their incredible naval hardware turned out to be “on the drawing board”.
Our people: correct. The best. One reason to have more (even if less expensive) warships, warplanes and combat brigades is to restore and add upon our advantage in people.
The Chinese ship is a tenth of the cost of ours, and they have the cash to build a bunch. As the Germans found out when faced with Soviet tanks “quantity has a quality of its own”
We are planing to have a Flight III of the Arleigh Burke class destroyerswith te AMDR or APY-6 radar.
Theirs is a warship and yours is an experimental test bed
“Theirs is a warship and yours is an experimental test bed”
True, so was the Saturn V.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.