Posted on 10/31/2016 11:50:52 PM PDT by Mozilla
The “New Urban Agenda” is a gimmick to make this happen and its heading for US cities. It suggests a path to an open borders agenda that will put all cities under international law. It is tied to Agenda 2030 which Obama has signed.
The social engineers in the UN stated, “By readdressing the way cities and human settlements are planned, designed, financed, developed, governed, and managed, the New Urban Agenda will help to end poverty and hunger in all its forms and dimensions, reduce inequalities, promote sustained, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth, achieve gender equality and the empowerment of all women and girls, in order to fully harness their vital contribution to sustainable development, improve human health and well-being, as well as foster resilience and protect the environment.”
The New Urban Agenda “contributes to the implementation and localization of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development in an integrated manner, and to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and targets, including SDG 11 of making cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable.”
“We share a vision of cities for all, referring to the equal use and enjoyment of cities and human settlements, seeking to promote inclusivity and ensure that all inhabitants, of present and future generations, without discrimination of any kind, are able to inhabit and produce just, safe, healthy, accessible, affordable, resilient, and sustainable cities and human settlements, to foster prosperity and quality of life for all. We note the efforts of some national and local governments to enshrine this vision, referred to as right to the city, in their legislations, political declarations and charters.”
The socialist agenda is the one that all will follow. There will no longer be a US Constitution if they achieve their goals.
“We aim to achieve cities and human settlements where all persons are able to enjoy equal rights and opportunities, as well as their fundamental freedoms, guided by the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations, including full respect for international law. In this regard, the New Urban Agenda is grounded in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international human rights treaties, the Millennium Declaration, and the 2005 World Summit Outcome. It is informed by other instruments such as the Declaration on the Right to Development.”
The plan outlines international socialist policies to be adopted by cities.
“We commit to promote national, sub-national, and local housing policies that support the progressive realization of the right to adequate housing for all as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, that address all forms of discrimination and violence, prevent arbitrary forced evictions, and that focus on the needs of the homeless, persons in vulnerable situations, low income groups, and persons with disabilities, while enabling participation and engagement of communities and relevant stakeholders, in the planning and implementation of these policies including supporting the social production of habitat, according to national legislations and standards.”
The agreement states that all countries are responsible but not equally responsible for addressing global environmental degradation. They will want global taxation to pay for their world of “equality”.
“We support the use of international public finance, including Official Development Assistance (ODA), among others, to catalyze additional resource mobilization from all available sources, public and private, for sustainable urban and territorial development, including by mitigating risks for potential investors recognizing that international public finance plays an important role in complementing the efforts of countries to mobilize public resources domestically, especially in the poorest and most vulnerable countries with limited domestic resources.”
The final version acknowledges the “right to development”, a concept which was first brought to the U. N. in the early 1990s [it’s a “human right” to go and live anywhere”. People might remember that Eric Holder as DoJ head said it is a human right and a civil right to come to the US illegally]. The document also maintains a reference to “countries and territories under foreign occupation”, a nasty reference to the Israelis in the West Bank. And it “strongly urge[s] states to refrain from promulgating and applying any unilateral economic, financial, or trade measures”, a reference to the U. S. embargo of Cuba.
Rumors are circulating that Obama will recognize Palestine as a State, which will lead to far more serious conflicts in the region and which falls in line with his views.
This agenda proposes the worst of globalism, socialism, and redistribution. It’s all “voluntary” for now.
Hillary Clinton, backed by communist George Soros, is in full support of open borders. She told Wall Street bankers she envisions the U.S. as part of a single “hemispheric common market with free trade and open borders,” according to WikiLeaks tranches.
Also thanks to Wikileaks, we know that Mrs. Clinton told Goldman Sachs bankers that Americans who want to limit immigration are “fundamentally un-American.”
Hillary has a lot of company in wanting open borders, making this globalist manifesto a serious potential threat.
Not only does she approve of the president’s open border policy, she plans to do more including putting all illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship. She will at a minimum increase immigration of refugees by 550%.
Liberals disgust me.
I dont see Russia and China going for this.
India either.
It will be western Europe and the US giving money to AFRICA.
That ain’t happening.
TRUMP UP .3 HILLARY UP .1 IN DAYBREAK! :) We are officially out of the margin of error with one more good night!!!!
Someone put the thread up :)
ping
bookmark
one word: Utopia
three words: It doesn’t exist
Human nature told me so.
Liberals disgust me.
And just wait until the lefties get to live their dystonian socialist dream in the flesh in small containers they can barely stand up in and have to live on rations while their eltiteists counterparts get to look down on them and enjoy the finer things in life. Oh they won't want any part of it after 1 week doing without their twinkles, Starbucks lattes, or video games.
If the liberals get to keep power, starting this close to socialism, we're in for a very ugly ride. Sympathy? Even their own voters won't get any from their elite rulers.
Anybody else get the feeling that maybe there was a "Non Human" helping to write this carp?👽
Or should I just brush this off as Family from France helped pen this dribble.👽
Signed,
B. Conehead
Sounds like something out of 1984.The things you mention never existed. Just eat your 2 grams of chocolate it is more then the 3 grams last week,
enjoy your increase and quit complaining. If you don’t comply you will end up down the memory hole and never existed.
“Freedom and western values could in two generations bring the world’s poor up to our standard of living.”
Two generations isn’t enough time to raise IQs by 40 points. It’s not going to happen.
I wonder how islam will take to this?
I said this forever. There are three ideologies. Communist, Islamist and Free Man. For the first two to flourish, you have to get rid of the third, which means the US and Israel.
That’s what Obama started, which explains why a Islamocommunist is in the white house.
Two generations is enough time to fix diet, which will raise IQs, although not always by enough. There are, however, many people living in poverty worldwide who are smart enough to do better given freedom and opportunity.
There are many in our country with exceptionally low IQs too. Most of them vote for Barack Hussein and for Hillary, rather than doing something productive, but they're here. Most of the wealth gap could disappear by bringing them up, although that doesn't give the far left a feeling of power over the little people, so liberals hate that idea.
Ayeah, that estimate is extremely optimistic. Three generations is the absolute bare minimum for a nation-wide ‘uplift’. Christian missionaries have done a two-generation uplift that in a HANDFUL of tribes that were generally in the middle of nowhere, well away from any consistent contact with the outside world. And that’s when they weren’t killed or run off.
With the first generation you generally have to teach them who’s the new sheriff in town, sometimes with “plenty of bullet points in your illustration” as one person put it. With the second you can make a varying degree of progress but you often have bitter/resentful/superstitious parents poisioning the well. With the third generation most of the people who are clinging to the old ways are dying off naturally and their grandchildren usually have some natural inclination to disregard them. Then you’re off and running. But this is again in a best-case scenario.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
