Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Foreign Election Monitors Unhappy About 13 States’ Ban on International Observers
cnsnews.com ^ | 10/27/16 | Patrick Goodenough

Posted on 10/27/2016 10:00:08 AM PDT by ColdOne

(CNSNews.com) – As it prepares to observe the November 8 elections, an Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) mission already in the U.S. drew attention on Wednesday to the fact that 13 states explicitly forbid international election observation.

That prohibition, it said, ran contrary to the “requirements” set down in a 1990 document drawn up by the OSCE’s precursor, the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe.

“Election observer access is determined by the state or county,” the mission said in an interim report. “Eight states explicitly allow for international election observation while thirteen states explicitly forbid it which is not in line with the requirements of paragraph 8 of the 1990 OSCE Copenhagen Document.”

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 10/27/2016 10:00:09 AM PDT by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Pound sand, Eurotrash.


2 posted on 10/27/2016 10:01:53 AM PDT by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
They can all go

Sit n' Spin...

3 posted on 10/27/2016 10:02:29 AM PDT by GraceG (Only a fool works hard in an environment where hard work is not appreciated...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
Tough
 Sh!t
4 posted on 10/27/2016 10:03:03 AM PDT by tomkat (we are legion .. we are pissed .. and we are coming !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Happily, Texas does not give a damn how foreign monitors feel about it.


5 posted on 10/27/2016 10:03:20 AM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Someone should publish where they are staying when in my state.


6 posted on 10/27/2016 10:04:19 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

From the article:

“The U.S. states that prohibit international election observation are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Connecticut, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia.

(Four years ago, the Texas’ Attorney-General warned the OSCE that any observer who approaches a polling station in the state could be prosecuted.)

Another eight states have laws that explicitly allow foreign observers to be present at polling stations on election day – California, Colorado, Missouri, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota and Washington.”


7 posted on 10/27/2016 10:04:55 AM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

“Happily, Texas does not give a damn how foreign monitors feel about it.”

I’d love for these a$$holes to challenge a Texas polling place and get their butts thrown in jail!


8 posted on 10/27/2016 10:05:49 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I’d think that, on the whole, the more people watching the better. If someone from Italy says that Philly or Chicago is corrupt, it may carry more weight with non-Republicans than if a Republican says it.


9 posted on 10/27/2016 10:06:17 AM PDT by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G. K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

EU: I’m thinking of a four letter acronym that starts with F, has two vowels in the middle, and ends with D....


10 posted on 10/27/2016 10:06:59 AM PDT by mewzilla (I'll vote for the first guy who promises to mail in his SOTU addresses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

Looks like a mixed bag of states. No discernible pattern...........


11 posted on 10/27/2016 10:09:15 AM PDT by Red Badger (WhereÂ’s that VIDEO the Anonymous group promised us????????????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

FOAD?...............


12 posted on 10/27/2016 10:10:29 AM PDT by Red Badger (WhereÂ’s that VIDEO the Anonymous group promised us????????????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

thirteen states explicitly forbid it which is not in line with the requirements of paragraph 8 of the 1990 OSCE Copenhagen Document.”

Then just SHOW UP and Take your Chances on Getting Arrested and thrown in PRISON for a Few Years, as well as 100% Civil Asset Forfeiture.

POS Eurotrash islam death worshippers.


13 posted on 10/27/2016 10:11:15 AM PDT by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Umm...er...yes.


14 posted on 10/27/2016 10:11:56 AM PDT by mewzilla (I'll vote for the first guy who promises to mail in his SOTU addresses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

It’s offensive to have foreign observers, but last time didn’t the foreign observers ask where the picture IDs and the purple ink were?


15 posted on 10/27/2016 10:14:29 AM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

It was the only one that fit.................;^)


16 posted on 10/27/2016 10:18:27 AM PDT by Red Badger (WhereÂ’s that VIDEO the Anonymous group promised us????????????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vette6387; Chode; Squantos; All

Heck just blindfold and handcuff, drive to either the middle of Big Bend or inbetween El Paso and Midland in the scrub desert and turn them loose to play “Pet the Bobcat/Mountain Lion” or “Scorpion Hunt” if they want to count something.


17 posted on 10/27/2016 10:31:33 AM PDT by mabarker1 (Progress- the opposite of congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

I’m in the minority here. My view is that sunlight is the best disinfectant. The more observers, the more likely we can mute potential corruption. As long as foreign observers take no action to influence or interrupt the electoral process, let ‘em watch.

However, it is up to the states to make this determination. Unless we sign and the Senate ratifies a treaty, which is legally binding, the states have no obligation to permit foreign observers. These observers are here due to an executive agreement, which has no force of law outside the federal executive branch.


18 posted on 10/27/2016 10:42:30 AM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
We are a Constitutional representative republic, not a crappy offshoot of the UN. OSCE can pound sand.
19 posted on 10/27/2016 11:09:19 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
WTF Alert!
20 posted on 10/27/2016 11:18:03 AM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson