Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump and Reagan: The Borking of Donald Trump, Part 2
Scott Lively Ministries ^ | Oct 20, 2016 | Scott Lively

Posted on 10/27/2016 8:28:14 AM PDT by fwdude

Many of the people announcing an intention to vote for Donald Trump are adding a disclaimer to distance themselves from his unsavory comments or actions of the past. I’m not going to do that. In my view Donald Trump is today a far different and better man than the one who threw his hat in the ring at the start of this election cycle. I credit that to the unprecedented level of public vilification – the “Borking” of Donald Trump – that he has endured and appears to have been transformed by.

Whatever his worldview and the context of his past experience might have been, and regardless of the level of his sincerity at the beginning of his campaign, this man has made himself the spokesman for numerous positions and values that Christian conservatives (at great personal cost) have advocated for years. He hasn’t just pandered to us, he has walked in our shoes these past months, going far beyond the minimum necessary to align himself with us, and learned firsthand what we have endured at the hands of the Marxist elites. And through it all he hasn’t been intimidated into caving and pandering to the left like every other champion we’ve put our hopes in — including the otherwise stalwart Mike Pence in the Indiana RFRA debacle. Trump’s transformation is the best example of personal growth and maturity in a public figure that I’ve seen in my lifetime.

What more could Christian conservatives hope for than to watch a man of Trump’s wealth, power, acumen and courage discover the truth of the culture war and the utter corruption of the left by personal experience on his path to the White House?

At the risk of committing political sacrilege here, I’m going to suggest that Trump is at this stage of the process a better candidate than Ronald Reagan was in terms of his potential to advance conservatism. To be sure, Trump isn’t in the same ballpark when it comes to articulating conservative views, but in terms of his freedom from control by the globalists the asymmetrical relationship is reversed. It is Trump who is in a league all his own. If Reagan was Teflon, Trump is Kevlar.

While Reagan beat the elites in 1980, he was nonetheless forced to accept George H.W. Bush as VP (while Trump has the vastly superior Mike Pence at his side). With Reagan the globalists simply bided their time, content to let him pursue the common goal of rebuilding the US military and taking down their geo-political competitors in the Soviet Union, and only stepped out of the shadows when it looked like Reagan would put a lasting barrier in the path of their One-World agenda in the form of a Robert Bork seat at the Supreme Court (compounding the threat already posed by the venerable Reagan nominee, Justice Antonin Scalia). Reagan was then forced to accept the Quisling Anthony Kennedy, author of all five of the landmark LGBT Supreme Court opinions from 1996 to 2015 that systematically purged Biblical values from constitutional law.

With Bork dispatched, H.W. Bush then succeeded Reagan and happily transformed Reagan’s authentic American Exceptionalism into an excuse and tool for global bullying backed by shiny new tanks, jets and aircraft carriers, all the while gradually undermining cultural conservatism on the domestic front, setting the course for the Neo-Cons from that time forward.

In contrast, Trump would step into the presidency not just unbeholden to the GOP elites, but empowered to dismantle their elitist infrastructure by a mandate of newly educated and highly energized populist masses. And Trump’s list of potential candidates for the Supreme Court – pro-life constitutionalists all — have been pre-vetted by the entire conservative movement and the GOP establishment.

Reagan’s highly beneficial relationship with the USSR’s Mikhail Gorbachev took years to develop, but the even more critical relationship of Trump and Putin – perhaps the only path to avoid the Neo-Con’s imminent global war — is already pre-primed by a publicly acknowledged mutual respect and a shared realpolitik worldview.

Since Reagan, the Bushs and Clintons have served the globalist interests faithfully, trading power between the two dynasties just often enough to preserve the illusion of democracy, while ensuring a steady cultural drift toward global socialism. There was never any realistic chance of preservation or expansion of Reagan’s conservative legacy with the likes of Dole, Snake-in-the-Grass McCain, or Romney. And I believe the Bush/Clinton agreement for 2016 was always a Hillary presidency, with Jeb Bush playing the part of the amiable loser (ala Bob Dole) who would then hold the post of “heir apparent” for four or eight years.

But something happened on the way to the Hillary coronation: a world-wide rebellion against the globalist agenda which Donald Trump inherited by sheer providential timing. Trump’s candidacy represents just the current skirmish in the populist vs globalist struggle, but his victory, if it occurs, would mark the turning point in the war. And in addition to the presidency, he would assume the de-facto leadership of a transcendent global populist movement.

It is certainly possible that after the flame and fury of this election has subsided, a President Trump could drift back into his old ways of thinking and acting, but I doubt it. For those who face it with courage and fortitude, persecution is the “refiners fire” of character. This has been true of Christians throughout history and appears to be true of rapidly maturing Donald Trump, who has openly and unashamedly claimed Christ. In the great tide of American history it might eventually be recognized that the “Borking” of Donald Trump – intended for evil by Crooked Hillary and the elites – was the very thing that made the former New York libertine deserving of the presidency of the United States and a place of honor alongside Ronald Reagan.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Another great Trump article by Scott Lively. He makes some bold claims, but supports them with rational arguments.
1 posted on 10/27/2016 8:28:14 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fwdude

I will not add a disclaimer to my intent to vote for DT. He is the best by far that we have had an opportunity to vote for. It is so obvious that the “scandals” are manufactured that it is pathetic that people are so ill informed that they would do anything but debunk them. Donald is a man, a man who likes women, as well as loves them. He appreciates how God created woman and I am sure at times has lusted, which is a sin, but he who is without sin cast the first stone. Donald has recognized his sin and repented. I dare say the stone throwing should come to a ceasing halt.

As far as policies, no one has gotten it like Donald. I am grateful to God for him, because apart from a God send we wouldn’t be privileged to be able to vote for such a valiant, purposeful and wonderful man. Thank you God for raising him up. Please anoint him as our next President. May You allow, by Your grace for him to become our next President, as a loving act towards Your people, that we highly do not deserve, all in Jesus Holy and Perfect Name,


2 posted on 10/27/2016 8:42:12 AM PDT by Bellflower (Dems = Mat 6:23 ....If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
On the issue of Supreme Court nominees, let's discuss the likely scenario:

It is said that the Senate is likely to flip back to Democrats. Even if it doesn't the Democrats may stand to gain a few seats, making the Republican majority very bare. Let's assume a Trump presidency which nominates some staunch conservatives from Trump's previously proferred list. What chance is there of a single one being confirmed, considering:
1. Democrat's enduring sour apples over the current senate's refusing to take up a confirmation hearing for Obama's nominee.
2. The Democratic senators' acrid revulsion of anything even remotely conservative anymore.
3. The existence of the reliable leftist RINO's in the senate.

So, a stalemate simply results in a diminishing number in the Supreme Court. Still a win for conservatives, however. The next Supreme to die or become incompacitated by illness will likely be Ginsberg. That pares down the Supreme Court considerably to 7, 4 fairly reliable conservatives (Roberts and Kennedy sometimes excepted) and 3 confirmed Marxists. The best that could happen is for the Senate to relent and confirm, the worst, that the status quo be maintained, with an increasing likelyhood of one of the other leftists dying.

3 posted on 10/27/2016 8:48:51 AM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bellflower

My main agreement with Lively’s article is in Trump’s complete independence from establishment beholden-ness. That is a very powerful characteristic in a candidate. The lack of this independence is what has allowed what has happened to government over the past 25 or so years. That regime needs to be broken. And Trump is the one to do it.


4 posted on 10/27/2016 8:56:05 AM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
That pares down the Supreme Court considerably to 7, 4 fairly reliable conservatives (Roberts and Kennedy sometimes excepted) and 3 confirmed Marxists.

Such a development would tend to make the two remaining reliable originalists -- Alito and Thomas -- assassination targets...

5 posted on 10/27/2016 9:15:14 AM PDT by okie01 (atg -*7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Such a development would tend to make the two remaining reliable originalists -- Alito and Thomas -- assassination targets...

Agreed, but I didn't want to broach that possibility.

6 posted on 10/27/2016 9:32:48 AM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Such a development would tend to make the two remaining reliable originalists — Alito and Thomas — assassination targets...

Agreed, but I didn’t want to broach that possibility.
______________________________________________________

Up their sleeves?

VIDEO: Secret CIA Heart Attack Gun Declassified

http://firsttoknow.com/video-secret-cia-heart-attack-gun-declassified/


7 posted on 10/27/2016 9:37:24 AM PDT by Ms Mable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: okie01

There aren’t any admitted Originalists in the federal judiciary, and probably none in accredited law schools. At best, Alito, Thomas and the late Scalia are Textualists.


8 posted on 10/27/2016 9:39:07 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson