Skip to comments.
Millions of votes already cast point to a Hillary Clinton victory
nypost ^
Posted on 10/27/2016 7:03:15 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27
To: ChicagoConservative27
To: ChicagoConservative27
Yeah, and in “Republican leaning” Texas we’ve already had a few reports of voting machines changing votes to favor Hillary....
4
posted on
10/27/2016 7:04:57 AM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Nice try.
I’ll wait for the fat lady.
5
posted on
10/27/2016 7:05:07 AM PDT
by
smokingfrog
( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Hear that Hillary supporters? (all 20 of you)
It’s already in the bag. You don’t need to vote.
6
posted on
10/27/2016 7:05:08 AM PDT
by
ConservativeWarrior
(Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Full PSYOPS all across the corrupt media world as their last hope to DEPRESS TRUMP VOTERS from going out to vote.
EVERYONE! IGNORE THIS BULLSHHT!
To: ChicagoConservative27
Umm...are these people crazy to think that Hillary has a chance in Utah and/or Texas? This is such horse crap.
I thought the R’s had better turnout thus far in both FL and NC as well?
To: ChicagoConservative27
A NY paper predicts for hillary.
Wow, what a shocker...
NOT.
To: ChicagoConservative27
Anyone recall those precincts that were 100% Obama?
10
posted on
10/27/2016 7:05:36 AM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: ChicagoConservative27
11
posted on
10/27/2016 7:08:07 AM PDT
by
null and void
("Interfere in elections"="inform voters.")
To: ChicagoConservative27
12
posted on
10/27/2016 7:08:26 AM PDT
by
TTFlyer
To: ChicagoConservative27
Not one bit if this is based on actual votes cast for a particular candidate. They are all speculations about party registrations (for those states that classify them in general elections). My state doesn’t have Democrat or Republican voters - they are all just ‘registered voters’ in an election, and I seriously effing doubt any damned journalist has gone to the trouble to collate names of votes cast early with those on the registered roles and checked their primary voting proclivities. This is all horseshit.
13
posted on
10/27/2016 7:08:55 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: ChicagoConservative27
What do you expect from the New York Post?
They are going to manipulate data and claim that Hillary won all the way from now until Trump is inaugurated.
The MSM is the Country’s greatest threat.
15
posted on
10/27/2016 7:09:58 AM PDT
by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: ChicagoConservative27
Let me guess, I bet that stories like these were written at about this time in 1980.
16
posted on
10/27/2016 7:10:14 AM PDT
by
OttawaFreeper
("If I had to go to war again, I'd bring lacrosse players" Conn Smythe)
To: ChicagoConservative27
17
posted on
10/27/2016 7:10:21 AM PDT
by
tomkat
(we are legion .. we are pissed .. and we are coming !)
To: All
18
posted on
10/27/2016 7:10:40 AM PDT
by
musicman
(Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
To: ChicagoConservative27
Like clockwork, the media declares her the winner whenever Trumps poll numbers rise. So boringly predictable.
19
posted on
10/27/2016 7:11:24 AM PDT
by
arbee4bush
(My Dad, My Hero. Love You Dad!!)
To: ChicagoConservative27
What? Have they seen the ballots?
Ignore all media
Get Out The Vote
20
posted on
10/27/2016 7:11:35 AM PDT
by
Nifster
(Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson