I’d release the exact same video under the Prager U name and a false name. See if both get banned.
This article by Dennis Prager is a screed against freedom of the press.What! He’s complaining about censorship of conservative videos by YouTube - and I am calling that "a screed against freedom of the press?!!!” What is wrong with this picture? I shall explain.
I am posting this reply on FreeRepublic.com, a web site which I do not own - just as Dennis Prager does not own YouTube. The consequence for me is that if Jim Robinson, who does own FR, is not willing that my post should remain up on his site, it will be gone - and I have no recourse.
And I am good with that. First, because without moderation there would be porn plastered all over this site by libs, in order to repel conservatives from the site. Second, I freely admit that, as little influence as my posts here may have, I am not ambitious enough, and capable enough, to create my own web site which would give my posts even that modicum of influence. So, I choose to post on FR, to contribute financially to FR, and to hope that its influence increases.
Dennis Prager has an organization. He is well able, I presume, to establish and sustain his own web site and his own capability to host his own videos. Thinking that he can, rightfully even if he had the power, force another organization to do it for him is just fuzzy thinking.