Posted on 10/24/2016 8:50:42 PM PDT by boycott
Interesting but we need more physical proof, such as a look at the “ledgers” the Fixer referred to, paychecks, etc.
If his story is confirmed, it will show Hillary and her cabal of crooks and crazies as a “clear and present danger” to America.
To #25. That’s no Bat Child. It’s a picture of Hillary at an earlier age. Definitely a female bat thingy.
Agreed. I just saw the interview on youtube. Nothing there. Hannity spoke more than his guest. And his questions were not particularly insightful. Very little of how he worked, or what he worked on, was revealed.
Hannity was trying, but the guy just wouldn’t open up.
bttt
Thanks cfor posting this link. I DVR’d Hanity last night to see this and gee what a surprise, as soon as the interview starts my cable goes out and I get zero.
The Fixer has a Clinton Focus Group facilitator affect about his demeanor and manner of speaking. I need to take a shower.
Rush keeps mentioning Markie Post.
Hannity is the worst interviewer ever. He interrupts, asks combative questions, and alienates to interviewee.
I not sure why they had this guy on the show. He seemed reluctant from the start.
His fifteen minutes ended with me about eight years ago. I realized that Hannity makes EVERY thing he talks about about himself. There's a reason Savage calls him Sean Vannity.
Hannity has always been a northeastern RINO, albeit an amiable one. Not surprising he would back fellow New Yorker Trump. Hannity would not have had a reason to think Trump wasn’t a northeastern RINO who wanted surrender in the Culture War. I think Trump’s move to the right and old-fashioned American nationalism has brought Hannity along with him.
I kept waiting on for the big story. What a disappointment.
The interview was a big fat nothing. As usual, Hannity did most of the talking. He was even trying to put words in Rovin's mouth. Total waste of time.
I guess the only thing that can come of it is that Trump could use it to lower her “moral superiority” the media has created. He should ask if she denies having an affair with Vince Foster and others. Morally, she has no reason to look down on others.
I was frustrated watching it.
The guy was playing the game of talking but saying nothing. Dancing around every question....I don’t even know why he would have “come forward” with this kind of attitude. He revealed nothing and wanted nothing to stick to him.
Hannity never let him finish a sentence. Perhaps he would have eventually said something definitive if he’d been allowed to speak. Unless the man did a bait and switch - and Hannity was annoyed. Maybe the man was very straightforward and really gave up the goods privately, then started playing games on camera.
I think the guy chickened out once he was on the air and Hannity wound up with a big nothing burger.
Hannity did a horrible job with the interview. At the end I just went “huh?”. What exactly did this guy supposedly do for the Clintons? He was called “Mr. Fix It” but exactly how did it work? Probably the WORST interview of someone who supposedly had some secrets that I’ve ever seen.
Mr. Fixit basically said, “ I know stuff but I am not saying.”
“The NYT is becoming The Enquirer and The Enquirer is becoming the NYT.” Pretty good line.
The interview was designed to set up the article appearing tomorrow on newsstands.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.