Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wneighbor

Poll watching is very 20th century. Very anachronistic.

There’s no way to change evoting fraud by ‘watching’.

That’s what we’re up against unfortunately.


113 posted on 10/25/2016 8:43:45 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Black Agnes
Poll watching is very 20th century. Very anachronistic.

Maybe the term is misleading. You dont just watch. You can legally challenge a number of things from whether a voter is really eligible to the behavior of the paid election workers to the counting of the votes.

As a watcher, I have personally challenged the right for a number of people to vote that I didn't think lived in the precinct. Some showed they moved in, in every case I found out it was correct. CHallenged one absentee vote from a person in the nursing home that it was known had not spoken or been lucid in months. That was thrown out. I've also registered challenge to the count, our candidate lost by 4 votes, there was a recount due to my documentation and my candidate won by a few votes, can't remember that number.

115 posted on 10/25/2016 6:38:44 PM PDT by Wneighbor (Deplorable, livin in a swamp of crazy and lovin it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson