Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is how they roll.

I wouldn't even care if they were as biased as they are if they actually reported news!

They never simply report what Trump did and said, what Hillary did and said, what oppo stuff has come out about them. No.

They have to report what we should think without even reporting news.

1 posted on 10/23/2016 1:14:34 PM PDT by ifinnegan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ifinnegan

What the alphabet networks offer is not organic news, it is synthetic, manufactured news to fit their agenda. They mention, but never give wings to Hillary’s numerous scandals, just was said in a previous post.


2 posted on 10/23/2016 1:18:45 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (Stay ignorant, my friends! (if you watch mainstream media, you will!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

Hillary came in next to first.


4 posted on 10/23/2016 1:20:22 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob ( LOTS of /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

The last time I heard media Reporting ;ike this was when R.M.Nixion was running for his first term.


5 posted on 10/23/2016 1:23:01 PM PDT by SandRat ( (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

WHY WOULD ANY CONSERVATIVE WATCH NETWORK NEWS OR TV FOR THAT MATTER?

There’s so much technology out there that makes it possible to completely avoid them!!

Stop the madness and suffering!! :)


6 posted on 10/23/2016 1:25:28 PM PDT by dp0622 (IThe only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

Subscribe to One America News. $5 a month for sanity.


7 posted on 10/23/2016 1:26:30 PM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

The UK Daily Mail is especially obnoxious. All week, top story is a negative on Trump. All other Trump stories are negative. pastel stories about Hillary. Obvious that the editors went through hundreds of photos to pick the worst of Trump and the best of Hillary (not possible).


8 posted on 10/23/2016 1:27:59 PM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

I predict dozens if not hundreds of cases (some live on the air) of sepukku on election night.


9 posted on 10/23/2016 1:28:45 PM PDT by Ciaphas Cain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
The politburo never rests , especially and specifically not on Sundays
12 posted on 10/23/2016 1:29:56 PM PDT by seastay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
"it doesn't look like this latest release has harmed Hillary Clinton's campaign". That was it...that's an editorial, not a news report - professional journalist is an obvious oxymoron....
15 posted on 10/23/2016 1:33:45 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

I listen to the local news radio station when I commute in the weekday morning.

In the last month they have always devoted thirty seconds to a minute on the national election.

They have never mentioned the word Wikileaks.
Most of the stories are horserace “Hillary has big lead among...”
Trump is only mentioned in the context of groping women.

That is their election coverage.

This is like a McDonalds serving nothing but raw burgers—puke, puke, puke.


17 posted on 10/23/2016 1:35:57 PM PDT by cgbg (This space for rent--$250K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
Frank Lutz says Trump should be polling better at this time and would be if he'd appealed to disaffected independents.

What a complete tool. Who does he think is attending all the Trump rallies?

18 posted on 10/23/2016 1:38:14 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (TRUMP THAT BEYOTCH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

“Typical network news report on the election .”

In a similar vein:

WHDH Boston (NBC) this morning. 9:30 a.m. (They go off at 10.)

A standing report by the anchor in front of “Election 2016” screen:

“Donald Trump with some controversial comments at his rally yesterday, but Hillary was not without her problems of her own in her speech yesterday.”

Video: NFL football game.

Anchor: “Well, obviously the wrong video there, but we’ll bring that to you later.’

Never happens in the next thirty minutes they’re on the air.

Since this newscast was on the air for one or two hours previously, I assume they ran the clip of Hillary, got pushback, and were not allowed to run the clip again.


19 posted on 10/23/2016 1:39:58 PM PDT by Chad N. Freud (FR is the modern equivalent of the Committees of Correspondence. Let other analogies arise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan
 photo 74a4241f-9bbb-4503-977f-d36883d4ddfd_zpskor7hujl.jpg
27 posted on 10/23/2016 2:09:32 PM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ifinnegan

ABC news ran an anti Trump Clinton commercial as “news “ on prime time Friday. If I never watch ABC news again it will be to soon.


28 posted on 10/23/2016 3:57:01 PM PDT by carcraft (Pray for our Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson