Great Post!
First let’s kill all the hedge fund managers.
Oh hell no!
The Federal Reserve and our fiat money are enabling the highest levels of corruption and progressive/crony control.
they control the supply of money - the most important commodity of all. Wall Street is too big to fail as they are an arm of state control and the US Government.
What do you expect?
Isn’t this exactly what Conservatives were pushing when they wanted to “privatize” Social Security?
Sirota is a big leftie.
She is going to splinter her own party over this.
He knows the Clintons are very good at Funneling Money
Regarding a so-called federal retirement tax, patriots are reminded that a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified that Congress is prohibited from appropriating taxes in the name of state power issues, basically any issue, such as retirement, that Congress cannot justify under its constitutional, Article I, Section 8-limited powers.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
The reason that there are unconstitutional federal social spending programs like Social Security and Medicare is the following imo. Taking Social Security for example, FDRs state-sovereignty ignoring justices wrongly accepted Congresss claim that the Constitutions General Welfare Clause (1.8.1) gave Congress the specific power to establish social spending programs like Social Security as evidenced by the Courts decision in Helvering v. Davis.
But the major constitutional problem with regarding the General Welfare Clause as a specific delegation of power is the following. Noting that James Madison is generally regarded as the father of the Constitution, FDRs activist justices wrongly ignored President James Madisons official clarification that the General Welfare Clause was not intended as an express delegation of power, but meant to be understood only as an introductory clause for the clauses that followed it in Section 8 which are delegations of specific power.
To refer the power in question to the clause "to provide for common defense and general welfare" would be contrary to the established and consistent rules of interpretation, as rendering the special and careful enumeration of powers which follow the clause nugatory and improper. Such a view of the Constitution would have the effect of giving to Congress a general power of legislation instead of the defined and limited one hitherto understood to belong to them, the terms "common defense and general welfare" embracing every object and act within the purview of a legislative trust. James Madison, Veto of federal public works bill, 1817
Remember in November !
Patriots need to support Trump / Pence by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support Trumps vision for making America great again for everybody, but will also put a stop to unconstitutonal federal taxes and likewise unconstitutional inteference in state affairs as evidenced by FDRs unconstitutional New Deal spending programs.
Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices.
Funneling billions of middle class money to Wall Street? We already have that...its called IRAs and 401Ks.
“It seems like a very bizarre time to initiate such a proposal considering many public pension funds are actively ditching alternative managers after realizing theyve been paying extraordinarily high fees for pitiful performance.”
This seems to explain perfectly the timing and urgency of the proposal from Wall Street’s perspective.
Redistribution the crony communist way.