Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paladin2

But it’s OK. It’s for the toddlers.


4 posted on 10/20/2016 8:01:46 AM PDT by cyclotic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: cyclotic

What did “Heller” have to do with children? That was a complete pivot.

Herself was blasting away at the Supreme Court for even taking up the challenge to the DC gun control statute. After all, that was “settled law”, and therefore inviolate.

No matter how inept and inadequate the DC gun ordinances were in regards to actually controlling “gun violence”.


10 posted on 10/20/2016 8:06:46 AM PDT by alloysteel (Of course you will live in interesting times, Nobody has a choice, now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: cyclotic

She defers to the safety of toddlers, but not if they’re just a few hours from being born.


11 posted on 10/20/2016 8:07:05 AM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: cyclotic

***It’s for the toddlers.***

One of Bill’s favorite ways to sugar coat a bad proposed law. So many times he would propose some illegal power grab, and I would tell everyone, “Wait for it!”

Then he would end his speech with...”To protect our Children!”

Hillary now wants power to “protect toddlers”.


36 posted on 10/20/2016 8:36:53 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Evil women. Jezebel, Athaliah, Livia Drusilla, Messalina, Lucrezia Borgia, Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson