Many of the nations listed contribute to terror according to Hillary herself.
Foreign Registered Agents. They represent these countries and money is from those nations?
Am I misreading this? If not = smoking gun.
If this is true, it is a criminal act.
I am pretty sure that campaign contributions from foreign countries IS illegal. But even if it wasn’t, why would ANYONE vote for someone who has received money from foreign countries? Why should other countries get a say in our policies, what our tax rates our, what our defense posture is? That is just insane.
Lot of socialists mentioned.
Saudi
Oman
Morroco
Yemen
Was at a dinner over the weekend where I was in the minority of being a Trump voter. I wasn’t so much trying to convince the HRC voters that they should NOT vote for her, but moreso just pointing out all the crap HRC has pulled. The bottom line is this: They didn’t care.
They are so dialed into “it’s politics as usual and it’s filthy” and they brush it off. To them all, Trump is just simply not fit. Bad temperament, bully, hates immigrants, disrespects women, can’t be trusted with nuke codes, etc. etc. etc... They do not want him representing the country.
They are far too low information to care about ANYTHING Wikileaks publishes than thinks the Russians are doctoring all of it.
I’m telling you right now, it comes down to 5 states and I’m starting to think we’ve let the media and the Dems do it again. Until we run a squeaky clean nominee, I’m wondering if we’ll ever have a non-Dem President again.
Ok, “concern trolls” have at me.....
That's illegal!
How stupid can they be.
That's what the Clinton Foundation and Clinton Global Initiative is for.
Sheesh...
*
I'm guessing you mean Money....
This is not the first time a Clinton took foreign monies.............
Yes, you are misreading this.
The question was whether the campaign should accept money from, or bundled by, people that were registered as agents/lobbyists for foreign countries/interests.
The money is not coming from the foreign country/interest. The issue is whether it would look bad because the person in question was a FRA, now or in the past.
Nothing illegal about it. It would just look bad if it was a repressive regime. In the end, they decided to just weather the storm if it came up. Most people wouldn't care, unless the candidate was Trump.
Hillary has only two political stances that are consistent between her “private stance” and her “public stance”
1) Kill Assange
2) Take the money!!