Balz is raising the bar for Hillary, and requiring her to do the impossible to “win”. Should we have a problem with that? His comments about who “won” the 2nd debate merely damn Hillary with faint praise.
Balz requirement #1: Hillary must explain the Wikileaks revelations.
Hillary couldn’t do that if she had 100 hours, and will not try; she will try to quash the whole issue by pretending to be a victim of Russian/Trump perfidy. Trump should point out that she is blowing smoke to avoid answering, and pound her with fact after fact revealed in the emails.
Balz requirement #2: Hillary must assert a compelling reason for her to be president.
That’ll be the day — She’s had 30 years to make her case and has come up with “gotta vagina”. Trump should make a positive case for getting the economy on track, taking a pro-American perspective, returning to the Rule of Law for everyone, flushing Hillary-style Big Government/Big Nurse policies and the elitist corruption she embodies. His goal will be peace instead of endless wars, and building prosperity so that refugees will not feel compelled to leave their homes. No more decline, corruption, globalist sell-outs of American jobs, foreign intervention, wars, and constant crises contrived to give government another excuse to grow at the people’s expense.
When Dems require Hillary to do more than show up and say “grope”, I’ll take it.
Those two points stood out for me also, ‘wikileaks’ and ‘reason she should be president’.
That the Post even —mentions— the wikileaks & reason-for-president is big news.