Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GilGil

Mandatory drug testing for both candidates. How is it even conceivable to argue against this?


41 posted on 10/15/2016 12:47:03 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: reasonisfaith

Unless the argument is “But we don’t want Hillary to get caught.” An argument that nails her anyway.


43 posted on 10/15/2016 12:48:41 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: reasonisfaith

There is no argument or debate here. They should be tested just prior to going on stage. Then make Congress line up for testing.


52 posted on 10/15/2016 12:53:17 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: reasonisfaith
Mandatory drug testing for both candidates. How is it even conceivable to argue against this?

I agree. You can't argue against unless you're a drugie or are employed for Ms Clinton's "Breaking Barriers" troll program.

Here is a McDonalds Job App description:

"Applicants should realize receiving interviews does not automatically qualify as hired. Many McDonald's locations may require that candidates undergo skills assessments, training programs, drug tests,.....

They can force you to have a drug test just to flip burgers at McDonalds.

63 posted on 10/15/2016 1:06:34 PM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson