Those refrigerants were banned because they attacked the ozone layer, not because they had anything to do with global warming.
Unless the increased UV rays have something to do with Arctic ice melting, or something. UV is stronger than regular light...
or maybe not - enough time has elapsed to show that it was more bogus baloney like AGW that ignores the sun’s impact on it all. So, what is the truth?
This from 20 years ago:
http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Ingles/Crista.html
The hole closed up over Antarctica:
https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2000/ast12dec_1/
Actually CFCs, chlorofluorocarbons are a different generation refrigerants that were banned to keep the “hole” in the ozone layer from increasing. They were replaced by HFCs, hydrofluorocarbons which the enviro-wackos are now claiming are “potent” greenhouse gasses. The “science” supporting their claims in both cases is dubious at best. It is now thought the “hole” in the ozone layer over the Antarctic is a phenomena that has occurred in the past and will continue to fluctuate in size in the future with or without chlorofluorocarbons. It is also a phenomena that is now thought to have little if any effect on people, animals, and plant life.
You’re correct, Not only were CFC Freon products banned, but many chlorinated chemical solvents used to degrease electronic products.
the release of Halogens into the atmosphere have a direct depleteing effect on the Ozone layer.