Posted on 10/14/2016 10:07:23 AM PDT by jerod
What crime did Ford pardon Nixon for?
The MFM hardly ‘ignored’ it. The ‘political junkies’ came out immediately to beat him about the head with the words he spoke. Never in a campaign has any party stooped so low as to make it appear America is nothing more than a banana republic. How can he claim to promise to jail hILLARY. There has NEVER been a candidate to make such a threat in public. (Perhaps it is time there should be)
Once again the MFM contorted his words to present what they wanted America to hear. The man said “I WILL APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE hILLARY’S CRIMES TO DETERMINE IF SHE IS GUILTY AND BELONGS IN JAIL. He did not suggest he would take office and jail her. He only suggested a fair investigation, a fair hearing and doing what was once done with any criminal in AMERICA.
Has this changed opinion of TRUMP? Yes, it will only encourage that we work harder, work faster, and be ready to roll when the time comes. And it is coming, BELIEVE ME
Valid point !
Nixon was facing inevitable impeachment for alleged knowledge of a criminal burglary
and chose to resign.
The Ford pardon closed the door on the issue as a sybol of national healing.
sybol = Symbol
It changed the dynamic in my household. My wife has always supported Trump once he became the nominee. But I have not seen her animated about politics in years. When I told her that Trump told Hillary that he would put her in jail, my wife brandished a fist pump and a hearty “YES!”.
While I agree with you in principle, I find that the weak generalities are political pabulum that has little power of persuasion outside the base. It is obvious that most people agree on the corruption of government and the extreme examples of lack of accountability. The key here is to bring those folks not following Trump into this fold. But one of the big rubs by the basic independent out there is that NO ONE tells them HOW they would do it, and they also feel that Trump is particularly weak on specifics. This approach blows holes in both of those. Maybe get Ben Carson, Kelli-Ann or Newt to go out and give it the heady approach on the shows. Start with the discussion that the government depend on 100s-of-THOUSANDS of people in positions of Public Trust, yet the American People do not trust the government, because of the IRS, Emails, Hillary activity, insider immunities, bla bla bla, then drop into the reasons for Public Trust and how it is a privilege, and how it can be removed for activity causing concern with folks in those positions. Then you drop the items. You do this on two or three talk shows, drop a couple of editorials on the topics and even go into the explanation that the Clintons and all of the activities around them essentially prevent them from fixing this issue.... BOOM!
He threatens to jail Hitlery, and the Globullists can’t figure out why he has the enthusiasm of the voting public. Talk about not getting it.
About that pardon- maybe. Hussein could well feel he has a lot to gain by disposing of the Clintons. He can’t do it physically without chancing a return blow but he can by not letting her win the election i.e. by not grossly manipulating the vote and by not giving the Clintons any pardons. That thought might have occurred to the Clintons and maybe feeds into their apparent desperation.
Criminal intention is not necessary to prove culpable violation of those particular laws.Any CEO on trial for corruption does not get the luxury of saying “I don’t remember” repeatedly. or saying he didn’t know the rules.
If Mrs Bill loses the election she loses control of the Clinton’s chunk of the Democrat Party. That may suit Hussein very well. It might also cause him to forget to pardon her.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.