Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judicial Watch Releases New Hillary Clinton Email Answers Given under Oath
JudicialWatch.com ^ | 10/13/16 | JudicailWatch

Posted on 10/13/2016 6:50:12 PM PDT by blueyon

Judicial Watch today released received responses under oath from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning her email practices. Judicial Watch submitted twenty-five questions on August 30 to Clinton as ordered by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

The new Clinton responses in the Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit before Judge Sullivan was first filed in September 2013 seeking records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former deputy chief of staff to Clinton. The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)).

Judicial Watch has already taken the deposition testimony of seven Clinton aides and State Department officials.

Below is text from the document filed with the court today:

NON-PARTY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON’S RESPONSE

TO PLAINTIFF’S INTERROGATORIES

Pursuant to the Court’s August 19, 2016 order and Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Non-Party Hillary Rodham Clinton hereby responds to Plaintiff’s Interrogatories dated August 30, 2016. The General Objections and the Objections to the Definitions set forth below are incorporated into each of the specific responses that follow. Any specific objections are in addition to the General Objections and Objections to the Definitions, and failure to reiterate a General Objection or Objection to the Definitions does not constitute a waiver of that or any other objection.

(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; email; foia; govtabuse; hillary; judicialwatch; mediabias; sos; sosclinton; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Hillary either "Did not recall" or "objects to the Interrogatories " to every question asked.............slick, deceitful and obstruction are a few words that come to my mind. Voters need to know this is nothing compared to what we will see if (God forbid) she wins.............VOTE TRUMP
1 posted on 10/13/2016 6:50:12 PM PDT by blueyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Thank you Judicial Watch for trying to honestly get answer


2 posted on 10/13/2016 6:51:06 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Maybe: “I was at home baking cookies for my daughter.”


3 posted on 10/13/2016 6:56:31 PM PDT by Mark (Obama Care is now DEMOCRAT CARE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Lying liars lie


4 posted on 10/13/2016 7:00:21 PM PDT by Nifster (Ignore all polls. Get Out The Vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I cannot recall....I cannot recall....I cannot recall....I cannot recall....I cannot recall....I cannot recall....


5 posted on 10/13/2016 7:02:23 PM PDT by Fractal Trader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon; zot; Interesting Times; NYer; 2ndDivisionVet

The old “Try to remember” parody song that Rush Limbaugh played during the original clinton years is now being done in reality and under oath.

Here is the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZbf4WxHkcI


6 posted on 10/13/2016 7:04:36 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

The answers were prepared by Sargent Schultz. I don’t know nothing!

These non answers are way of delaying real answers until after election. Hillary knows the motion to compel real answers won’t get heard by court before election.


7 posted on 10/13/2016 7:08:53 PM PDT by GOPe Means Bend Over Spell Run (GO GALT - VOTE TRUMP!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

Hillary and Comey under oath. Different conclusions. The only way out is for Obama to pardon both of them. Special investigation maybe but special prosecutor no.


8 posted on 10/13/2016 7:10:03 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

But does bh0 pardon them before or after Nov 8?


9 posted on 10/13/2016 7:13:49 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Thanks for posting this.

This is a refreshing change from pointless vanities, mis-represented emails, click-bait blog pimping, and nutjob conspiracy threads.

10 posted on 10/13/2016 7:16:46 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar

LOL I remember that


11 posted on 10/13/2016 7:19:38 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

It is getting tiring to hear “Bombshell” and then nothing isn’t it


12 posted on 10/13/2016 7:20:45 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

And if Hillary has so many gaps in her memory, is she medically capable of being president? It appears that her mind and ability to remember anything not on a teleprompter is failing quite rapidly.


13 posted on 10/13/2016 7:22:55 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Maybe: “I was at home baking cookies for my daughter.”

Well, it certainly wasn't: “I was at home baking cookies for Bill's son.”

14 posted on 10/13/2016 7:23:52 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blueyon; justlurking
It is getting tiring to hear “Bombshell” and then nothing isn’t it

That and "Breaking!!!"

15 posted on 10/13/2016 7:25:14 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
It is getting tiring to hear “Bombshell” and then nothing isn’t it

Most of these aren't "Bombshells". They are just flat wrong.

No, Hillary didn't use an American pejorative for blacks.

No, Hillary didn't "destroy" Muslims.

No, Hillary's campaign didn't conspire to commit murder.

No, Trump's latest accuser doesn't have the same phone number as the Clinton Foundation.

No, Podesta didn't withhold emails from the State Dept.

I could go on and on. I don't know why I care, but I'm trying to my part to keep FR from turning into a cesspool of nutjobs.

16 posted on 10/13/2016 7:28:43 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Killary, or rather her lawyers, answered these questions in the manner expected: deny, delay, obfuscate.

Nothing new here. Nothing expected either.

Elect Trump/Pence! Put an end to the Clinton Crime Machine.


17 posted on 10/13/2016 7:54:31 PM PDT by upchuck (On the issue of SCOTUS alone, Trump must win in November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

And some people think she has Parkinson’s disease. It’s obvious she has Alzheimer’s.


18 posted on 10/13/2016 8:23:35 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
- she throws Powell under the bus again.

- she invokes attorney-client privilege , yet that privilege only binds her attorney. Also, an exception to privilege is made, when the client speaks in presence of individuals who were neither attorney nor client, or was disclosed to such individuals.

If any statement by Abedin; Kennedy; Pagliano or Bentel shows they were present when Hillary made privilege statements, then she should be hosed there.

most of all the rest are the Sgt. Schultz defense.

she does have a curious too specific answer:
Response: "Secretary Clinton does not recall requesting a State Department-issued Blackberry or a State Department e-mail account in or around August 2011."

maybe it was in june or maybe it was in september? we know she had a spit load of blackberrys
19 posted on 10/13/2016 8:34:32 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

hey, F.B.I.,
You guys are horse shit.
least that is what your boss shows.


20 posted on 10/13/2016 8:47:18 PM PDT by Joe Boucher (hey Bill, rape anyone, Lately?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson