To: ErikJohnsky
The article specifically states that “whites” include Hispanics. I wonder what the stats would show if these two groups were broken out?
Also, I noticed that they didn’t include Asians. Is it because the number of inter-racially homicidal Asians is so small that it’s not worth counting? Are they also largely exempt from being murdered by members of other races? (If so, lucky them!)
11 posted on
10/06/2016 8:00:44 AM PDT by
bus man
(Loose Lips Sink Ships)
To: bus man
I think they count hispanics as white when they kill someone but they don't count them as white when they are the victim. I mean who do you believe, this liberal douchebag or your own eyes?
13 posted on
10/06/2016 8:35:34 AM PDT by
peeps36
(Obama = the skidmark on America's underwear.)
To: bus man
"The article specifically states that whites include Hispanics. I wonder what the stats would show if these two groups were broken out?"
Hispanics would not be an insignificant part of the white total, probably somewhere between 8%-20%, making it more difficult for the author to equalize the black/white stats, which - as others have pointed out - are already not normalized for population size.
21 posted on
10/06/2016 9:06:56 AM PDT by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: bus man
The article specifically states that whites include Hispanics. I wonder what the stats would show if these two groups were broken out?Unacceptable dammitt!
You sick, deplorable, homophobe, racist Xenophobe, sexist republican, tea bagger, ozone hating, puppy-killing, climate killing murdering scum!
Did I forget anything?
23 posted on
10/06/2016 10:13:12 AM PDT by
publius911
(IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson