Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fishtank

Ummm...at the risk of sounding ignorant - why doesn’t (didn’t) Armitage simply make the sample(s) available for others to study?

Regardless of his conclusions, the sample(s) should stand on there own.


14 posted on 10/04/2016 1:20:40 PM PDT by jonno (Having an opinion is not the same as having the answer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jonno

“why doesn’t (didn’t) Armitage simply make the sample(s) available for others to study?”

Who said he hasn’t?


21 posted on 10/04/2016 1:38:21 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: jonno; fishtank
Ummm...at the risk of sounding ignorant - why doesn’t (didn’t) Armitage simply make the sample(s) available for others to study?

One's ignorance is generally placed on display when one comments on an article before one has taken the time to read it (a familiar habit of too many here on FR).

As quoted from the article:

"Obviously, this kind of find is amazing. Not surprisingly, he and his colleague, Dr. Kevin Lee Anderson, wrote a report on their discovery so that other scientists could learn from it. The report was published in the peer-reviewed, secular journal entitled Acta Histochemica."

"Students would come down to his lab and ask to see the dinosaur cells. They would talk to Mr. Armitage about his discovery and ask him what he thought it meant. He would tell them that he thought it meant the Triceratops fossil couldn’t be millions of years old."

FReegards!

 photo million-vet-march.jpg

24 posted on 10/04/2016 1:45:00 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson