Posted on 10/03/2016 12:03:45 PM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
It that why Rubio is leading by 6 pts?
he’s losing 47 to 61, according to the chart.
I do live for the daybreak poll, which is sad, but also because it’s a very good poll and shows how 3000 people are reacting through the ENTIRE election.
He is up by almost 5. He is maybe .3 percent of being out of the MOE.
calling different people every day can bring an entirely different result than the day before.
Trump is not losing NC. That’s all I had to see to know this was garbage.
maybe comey can help out somehow by letting some more clinton workers destroy their PCs.
Agreed!
Look at Future Useless Eater’s reply in the USC/Daybreak poll - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3476102/posts?page=17#17
Almost every presidential election people keep saying Pennsylvania is in play for the Republican, and it never actually goes Republican. I’m not counting on it this time either.
Not “is going” but has gone. 25% of ALL Rs and Ds have now gotten a ballot and R requests up 43-37%.
According to rolling Reuters Trump getting Is at 1.64:1
Great article
A 4.2 MOE??? Pure garbage.
Not getting your drift? In most polls Rubes is up huge, high double digits, so big they pulled all Dem Senate Committee support from his opponent.
If he’s up only 6 in this, good sign it’s a fraud.
Well, the point is that Rubio is winning and I doubt Trump is going to lose in FL.
saw the post.Your FULL quote was:
“Conclusion: Preliminary results from Hillsborough is pointing to a very tight race”.
So you make a long analysis about Hillsborough County, Florida and now claim that justifies making the claim that “as I’ve been saying, going to be a tight race”.
In point of fact, you said ONCE that “Preliminary results from Hillsborough is pointing to a very tight race”.
Ok. Yes, but ALL other polls have him winning huge. Trump would have to trail him by 10 points not to win.
catnipman,
wow, you won’t give up.
“Uh, yeah, right Noob: I looked at your less-than-two-weeks worth of posting history since you joined, and you’ve never once said this was “going to be a close election”.
Proved “NEVER ONCE” was wrong with this post:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3474072/posts
“In point of fact, you said ONCE that “Preliminary results from Hillsborough is pointing to a very tight race”.
Here is another post where I said it would be a close election proving your “ONCE” comment was wrong:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3474945/posts
How many times will you be WRONG and still insist that you are right? I wont be responding to you again. As Mr. Wonderful says on the Shark Tank, You Are Dead To Me.
I’m really concerned about this poll cherry picking - Ohio is right, Florida and NC’s sampling off, etc. Sounds too much like 2012 unskewing.
Until Trump is ahead in every poll, he and we should assume he’s behind. It’d be great if there’s some hidden monster vote that polls aren’t capturing, but I’m worried. Sanders drew large crowds too and lost.
Pence needs to reset this thing tomorrow night and Trump needs to slaughter her in the next debate. He can’t leave anything on the table like last time because these debates are his only opportunity to really break though our Pravda media to the broader electorate.
Dude needs to lay off the catnip.
Romney never really led in that 2012 RAND poll. Obama had it all the way after the DNC convention.
No doubt it is the same poll as “The 2016 USC Dornsife / LA Times Presidential Election Poll” In the link below I don’t see the graph, but it almost identical otherwise:
https://alpdata.rand.org/?page=election2012
The PDF (link below) has the 2012 details:
Agreed, that isn’t going to happen, especially since he clobbered Rubio in the primary in that State.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.