Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus

Apologize for the name calling. Now would be a goods time.


47 posted on 09/28/2016 11:56:44 AM PDT by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: FirstFlaBn

Or what? You’ll complain to the Diversity Counsellor that I made you feel like this wasn’t a safe place? If you want respect, read the article before you write.


48 posted on 09/28/2016 12:09:01 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: FirstFlaBn

To wit, witless:

“Or some of this lead could be noise, or some of it could be a continuation of a trend which had been noisy, but trending upward over the last few days (but had gone down slightly the previous two days).

“So it’s hard to say HOW big of a deal this trend is. But it’s hard to imagine that Hillary benefited from the debate, and that this is purely noise which will reverse itself over the next few days. The USC poll is of over 2,500 people, and Trump’s lead is approaching the outer boundaries of the 95% confidence limit.”


49 posted on 09/28/2016 12:09:57 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson