Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Az Joe

Lester Holt wanted to avoid being Matt Lauered.

Ironically enough, that set the wrath of liberals upon him for giving away the store in blatant partisanship.

Poor Holt! He did what the Left wanted him to do and the Left thought he made Trump seem instead a very human and sympathetic figure.

Exactly the opposite of the mission the Left demanded Holt fulfill and he screwed the pooch.

The poor liberal ref - what was he supposed to do? And Trump is still standing in the wreckage of Holt’s failed attempt to take him out.

Holt got smoked to smithereens by his own blatant bias.


10 posted on 09/27/2016 2:32:35 AM PDT by goldstategop ((In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: goldstategop
I have a different take on this. The moderator's job isn't to be impartial. The moderator's job isn't even to be a moderator.

The moderator's job is to make sure the election appears close enough that people will actually tune in to his network for the next six weeks. If Lester Holt exhibited any bias in favor of Clinton, it's because his network bosses told him she's losing this race.

11 posted on 09/27/2016 3:09:44 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson