Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Be Careful

I question his judgment.

There’s no way any sane person should even consider voting for PIAPS!


4 posted on 09/25/2016 12:47:21 PM PDT by sauropod (Beware the fury of a patient man. I've lost my patience!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: sauropod

When he says he is voting for Hillary, for his safety, it always told me he wasn’t voting for her.


11 posted on 09/25/2016 12:51:21 PM PDT by mancini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod
As most of you know, I had been endorsing Hillary Clinton for president, for my personal safety, because I live in California. It isn’t safe to be a Trump supporter where I live.

in other words, it was a joke

36 posted on 09/25/2016 1:10:30 PM PDT by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

>>I question his judgment.

His judgment on this issue has been well-documented in his blog for the past year. His final decision to switch sides is quite momentous.


39 posted on 09/25/2016 1:18:37 PM PDT by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

Exactly. Hillary isn’t anything new in the Progressive party.

She isn’t unique, she is exactly like everyone else with the (D) in their name. Same exact person.

She represents her party with 100% precision and accuracy.


40 posted on 09/25/2016 1:22:20 PM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

Did you not read the explanation ... for his safety? Not for a second was he going to vote for her.


46 posted on 09/25/2016 1:29:50 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

I question your judgement because you clearly missed his original endorsement of Hillary as sarcasm. (for my personal safety)


59 posted on 09/25/2016 1:41:31 PM PDT by Tailback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod
I question his judgment. There’s no way any sane person should even consider voting for PIAPS!

He never really considered voting for Clinton. His earlier Clinton endorsement was 'tongue in cheek'. Nothing more than comedic entertainment.

61 posted on 09/25/2016 1:42:30 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

Scott Adams has stated for months he was endorsing Hillary Clinton for his safety, due to threats he received for talking positively about Trump.


71 posted on 09/25/2016 1:50:40 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

Well his Hillary endorsement was tongue and cheek ...he said he was doing it out of personal safety reason


80 posted on 09/25/2016 2:07:03 PM PDT by tophat9000 (King G(OP)eorge III has no idea why the Americans are in rebellion... teach him why)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

Personal safety..... we’ve all seen how unhinged the left gets.


88 posted on 09/25/2016 2:32:07 PM PDT by AFreeBird (BEST. ELECTION. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

He never said he would vote, let alone vote for her. He had said in earlier posts he would support her to prevent her supporters from harming him. He lives in California, so his vote, like mine, counts for nothing.


90 posted on 09/25/2016 2:48:09 PM PDT by Go_Raiders (Freedom doesn't give you the right to take from others, no matter how innocent your program sounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod
I question his judgment. There’s no way any sane person should even consider voting for PIAPS!

If you've been following him, he's been being sarcastic about that. :)

94 posted on 09/25/2016 3:07:09 PM PDT by Lazamataz (MSM ignoring Hillary's health until forced, shows us they are the MPM: Ministry of Propaganda Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: sauropod

Scott’s earlier declaration of voting for h-roids for his own safety may have been one of those ‘acts of persuasion’, implying perhaps that anyone who wants him to vote for h-roids is an effin goon. And thus, it may make such people think twice about what they are doing to him.


103 posted on 09/25/2016 3:40:01 PM PDT by Vision Thing (You know the depths of my heart, and You love me the same...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson