Academia emits cultural toxins while ostensibly "studying" culture. If these culture theorists were studying another culture, such as a primitive culture, would they use the engagement to proselytize for their ideals among the primitives? If not, why are they comfortable spreading their ideals while studying American "primitives"?
1 posted on
09/21/2016 10:26:01 AM PDT by
oblomov
To: oblomov
Using”art” as a forum for the dissolution of culture. How utterly marxist of her.
2 posted on
09/21/2016 11:28:30 AM PDT by
IronJack
To: oblomov
Art used to be “elevating”. Religious art was inspirational — the lives of the saints, the suffering of Christ, etc. Paintings and sculpture portrayed heroes, or showed the joy of domesticity or honest work.
Today? Art is intended to make you ashamed of yourself and your country. It’s “transgressive” and is supposed to make you uncomfortable.
3 posted on
09/21/2016 12:43:58 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson