Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Academia emits cultural toxins while ostensibly "studying" culture. If these culture theorists were studying another culture, such as a primitive culture, would they use the engagement to proselytize for their ideals among the primitives? If not, why are they comfortable spreading their ideals while studying American "primitives"?
1 posted on 09/21/2016 10:26:01 AM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: oblomov

Using”art” as a forum for the dissolution of culture. How utterly marxist of her.


2 posted on 09/21/2016 11:28:30 AM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: oblomov

Art used to be “elevating”. Religious art was inspirational — the lives of the saints, the suffering of Christ, etc. Paintings and sculpture portrayed heroes, or showed the joy of domesticity or honest work.

Today? Art is intended to make you ashamed of yourself and your country. It’s “transgressive” and is supposed to make you uncomfortable.


3 posted on 09/21/2016 12:43:58 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson