Posted on 09/18/2016 4:48:08 AM PDT by kevcol
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D., Fla.) denied Friday that George W. Bush won Florida in the 2000 presidential election, saying Al Gore won it and the Supreme Court elected Bush to the presidency.
MSNBC reporter Hallie Jackson did not push back on Schultz’s claim. In fact, she agreed. Bush won the state by an official tally of 537 votes after a prolonged recount period that eventually went to the Supreme Court.
.
.
"The Supreme Court elected the president," Schultz said. "Al Gore won the state of Florida in 2000, although not the presidency."
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
Too bad Common Core math wasn’t around back then for the Democrats. They hate math because numbers don’t lie. If only they could have confused everyone enough to steal the election for Gore.
Especially not counting the military votes
Hey Schultz blame Clinton and the Elian Gonzalez tragedy
That is why Gore lost Florida
Those”hanging chads” were caused by a democrap operative wiring too many ballots at once. You run a wire through the punch for your candidate in a stack of ballots. Too many ballots in the stack and you get chads. The end result is: (1) if no one was selected in the race, it’s a vote for your candidate, (2) if the ballot was voted for your candidate, nothing changes, and (3) if it’s a vote for your opponents, it becomes double vote and is rejected. The chads should have been on the Gore punch. Was an investigation done?
Debbie, want some cheese with that whine? Just go away! She needs to be thinking of excuses for Trumps victory in Florida.
Has Debbie’s parents been released from prison yet?
5.56mm
and what does that have to do with 16 years later... now... the present you SFC
The news organizations spent 9 months recounting every ballot in every way they could and could not make Al Gore the winner.
Debbie Washwerwoman-Schultz is a lying sack of crap with mayonnaise hair.
Opening volley for election theft attempt. “We’ll, you didn’t have any problem when SCOTUS chose Bush,...”
What the LMSM, Democrats, and Liberals don’t tell you about the 2000 Florida recount - it was NOT a state wide recount.
The losing Democrats demanded and got a cherry picked recount - it occurred only in a few counts where they figured they would “pick up” the most votes.
I was one of numerous Floridians who lived in counties that were not recounted because of their strong conservative population. It was very unpleasant to see a major American political party trash the Constitution in a blatant bid to seize power.
Democrats hold back ballot boxes until th ey know how many ballots need to be ‘stuffed’... They don’t want the fraud to be obvious. In Florida there was a rush at the end and the old ‘ice pick and hammer’ system of cheating produced too many hanging chads.
Gore didn’t win and the fraud was sloppy. A ‘mistake’ they won’t make with the new machines...
IF WE WANT TRUMP TO WIN WE HAVE TO HOLD BACK OUR BALLOT BOXES UNTIL THEIR VOTE IS IN... THEY THEY’LL BE FORCED TO ‘GUESS’ HOW MANY VOTES ARE NEEDED TO CHEAT.
You’re right - we won in spite of their fraud... because they were sloppy.
Gore wanted to recount Democrat leaning counties only. That was his idea of a “recount.”
I thought the chads were caused by loading multiple cards at once in a voting machine?
Which can also explain some of the odd Buchanan counts: someone doing wholesale ballot punching screwed up on a stack and punched the wrong hole.
They are setting it up for stealing in 2016.
“Hanging Chads” Schultz
Crawled out from under her Rock I see
“FREEPERS” stormed that vote counting center where
Democrat “vote counters” in Florida were “counting” those
“hanging chads” - all for Gore, of course. I will never
forget the Freeper banging on the door where they were
“counting”. (He was wearing a big Smiley-Face sticker on
his shirt! - Genius!)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.