” Congress knows the FBI was aware of a breach by foreign actors from Clinton’s server ..”
I thought her server wasn’t hacked? I thought her server didn’t contain any classified information? I thought she only deleted emails concerning yoga and wedding plans?
ARPANET, the deep web, the internet, the cloud....
If your electrons touched any part of any of these, a copy is still there.
This sounds like gibberish - perhaps referring to the "magnetic echos", my term, left by writes to a particular piece of memory. Supposedly one can see the history of what was stored in the memory as each write physically leaves an imprint, even when over written by subsequent writes.
I thought that was the point of Bleach bit was to bundle a set of disk clearing behavior to make reconstructing the data impervious to the aforementioned forensic recovery technique.
Maybe they had some offsite backups in the cloud?
With what HRC was doing its tough to keep track of it all.
When is Julian going to start releasing things?
After the dust settles from Hil’s recent ailments?
(hat tip hootowl)---Blumenthal was not a govt employee----he was Hillary's intel-gatherer who was paid by the Clinton Foundation. Blumenthal earned a staggering 320,000 dollars ....on the Foundation books as being hired to "preserve Bill's presidential legacy".
The Obama administration had barred him from official work due to his notoriously checkered ethics. He fed Hillary all sorts of information, including intelligence from Libya -- some of which was clearly designed to enhance his personal financial interests.
Hillary encouraged and solicited Sid's emails (something she later denied), and occasionally kicked his information up the chain...scrubbing his name from the missives and presenting them as hers.
It was through Blumenthal's hacked personal emails that we discovered that Hillary had unilaterally deleted work-related content from her private email server, which she swore she hadn't done. (More evidence that she lied about this is here). Confronted with his evidence, she attempted to massively shift the goalposts of what counts as "work-related," insisting that Blumenthal was just an old friend whose correspondence was personal in nature.
But here we have more evidence of Blumenthal acting as a high-level diplomatic informant, this time on matters related to Egypt. And Hillary quite obviously takes the material seriously, passing it along to other State Department officials for further discussion. This is the veritable definition of work-related material.
Everything -- everything -- Hillary Clinton has said about her improper email scheme is a lie. What else does the FBI know that the public still does not?
===============================================
UPDATES - Here's the State Department's slippery explanation:
They have no information "at this time" that this material ended up being emailed to her. (So why wouldn't it have been? More than 1,000 other classified emails were sent to her, including secret and top secret material).
==============================================
Hillary wasn't remotely cautious about this stuff, even though it was her sworn duty to be cautious about S/D intel. Plus, this State Department official says, the definition of "non-paper" is "colloquial" and capacious -- so who can really say what she meant, exactly? The official won't speculate as to whether the talking points in question were classified, as some non-classified material is also stored and disseminated securely.
If that's the case here, why would Hillary request that the "identifying heading" be removed prior to being sent "nonsecure"? Once again, the cavalier manner in which she habitually treated classified material is highly relevant.
According to Fox's report, the talking points have since been redacted. The subject of those talking points has also been redacted by the State Department, citing the "deliberative process" exemption to FOIA requests. --SNIP--
*
-- IMMEDIATELY!
Whether possible or not let her think it’s possible.
Indeed yes
Yes, of course, in principle. The question is how secure Guccifer's collection is (which might not have been intended to be all that secure), as well as "wiretap" or "man in the middle" access to the network traffic that handled the transportation of the information to and from his equipment.
ISPs can collect EVERYTHING that passes through, trivially.
FWIW, this so-called "dark web" is nothing more than systems that aren't cataloged by domain-name. The systems are all hooked up to the same network. Your computer is part of this "dark web," and you could admit access to parts of it on your volition. People who VPN (virtual provate netowrk) are a common part of the "dark web."
Please release me, let me go,
For I don’t love you anymore.
To live a lie would be a sin.
Release me and let me love again.
Haven’t you heard of Google’s cache? Bing has one too.
They allow you to retrieve cached copies of website pages.
Same thing for emails and attachments. The web makes cached copies of everything. It is never secure unless it is encrypted, a secure server. And even then there can be hacks to it.
Clinton, Blumenthal, and the like are not smart. They are actually clueless people who know how to lie and enrich themselves.