Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Hillary wants to destroy US industry using the "climate change/global warming" excuse, while Trump wants to keep development in the US, while investigating to see if there really is an impending problem.

Trump's approach sounds like the more rational one.

1 posted on 09/14/2016 7:08:06 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

A haiku:

She’s a pharm expert:
Epipens, vodka
Bill brings the cocaine


2 posted on 09/14/2016 7:17:52 PM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I went to the site and read the actual responses. Trump’s make me more enthusiastic about voting for him. I am pulling the lever for him in November; he is doing more lately to make me feel better about this decision.


6 posted on 09/14/2016 9:28:23 PM PDT by Ingtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

12. Food

Agriculture involves a complex balance of land and energy use, worker health and safety, water use and quality, and access to healthy and affordable food, all of which have inputs of objective knowledge from science. How would you manage the US agricultural enterprise to our highest benefit in the most sustainable way?

Donald J Trump: The implication of your question is that there should be central control of American agriculture by the federal government. That is totally inappropriate. The agriculture industry should be free to seek its best solutions through the market system. That said, the production of food is a national security issue and should receive the attention of the federal government when it comes to providing security for our farmers and ranchers against losses to nature.


7 posted on 09/14/2016 11:34:58 PM PDT by SubMareener (Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR!e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

George Orwell’s “ministry of truth” has nearly complete control already.

Any intellectually honest person who understands the Scientific Method realizes that opinion (consensus) doesn’t play a role in scientific efforts. Instead, real scientific endeavors pursue elimination of bias as a top priority.

If there’s an agenda other than the truth, then it’s not science.


8 posted on 09/15/2016 4:26:12 AM PDT by plsjr (<>< Mankind "knows" by trial and error; Only the CREATOR really knows His creation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson