Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bobsunshine

As I see it the working man and woman has 2 jobs when they have children. People on welfare and Social Security have none. Workers should be our first priority. Takers come second.


3 posted on 09/13/2016 4:48:11 PM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DIRTYSECRET

I was a worker for 52 straight years (plus two tours in Vietnam)...Now I’m retired and I get SS...

You have a problem with that???


8 posted on 09/13/2016 4:52:58 PM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

As I see it, I didn’t tell them to have kids.

Six weeks for what reason? Have you ever been on the working twice as hard part of this equation.


12 posted on 09/13/2016 4:55:34 PM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

All chilcare receivers should give thank you letters to their payers for raising their child.

No thank you card & video, no childcare payments.


46 posted on 09/13/2016 5:25:08 PM PDT by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Children & Women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Yeah, but the libtards will insist the welfare recipients should get paid for taking care of their kids, too. It is only fair... If we can put a man on the moon... For the children.... Women and children affected most...


51 posted on 09/13/2016 5:27:54 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

SOCIAL SECURITY IS NOT, NOT, AN ENTITLEMENT!!


83 posted on 09/13/2016 5:53:57 PM PDT by varina davis (WHOEVER TELLS IT LIKE IT IS FOR 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Demography declining they are filling in the gaps with “immigrants and refugees”
Makes sense to funnel saved dollars from IA dependency into scaffolding healthy families after the scorched earth globalism agenda.
Deporting trespassers and taxing remittances the entire time. It should provide the backbeat to this plan.


84 posted on 09/13/2016 5:54:30 PM PDT by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

People on Social Security are not takers.

They paid into the only game in town for forty years or more you dolt.


87 posted on 09/13/2016 6:05:04 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Fifty-six days until we take measures to end this nightmare. Trump, for the Free World...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

They’re always talking about how social security is going to go broke, but they NEVER say WELFARE is going broke.

There seems to always be enough money to hand out to people that won’t work or pay taxes.


119 posted on 09/14/2016 6:55:01 AM PDT by Ms Mable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET
So....let me get this correct.

My dad paid into Social Security for well over 46 years....Much of that time he paid double..as he was self-employed.

Well..as things happen he died at the age of 64. Never got one SS check...but you would have him labeled a "taker"..if he had lived another 20 years...collecting a SS check???

DO I HAVE THIS CORRECT?????

120 posted on 09/14/2016 7:00:21 AM PDT by Osage Orange ("I love this country, it's the government I'm afraid of")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET
So....you make this statement...and go dark.

Nice.....................

122 posted on 09/14/2016 7:03:17 AM PDT by Osage Orange ("I love this country, it's the government I'm afraid of")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: DIRTYSECRET

There is a segment of the USA population that gets screwed with all the benefits for ‘children & their parents”.

I am female. 76 + years old & still doing some part time work.

I NEVER had any children.

Every time a woman was out of work to have a kid or another kid, the work load just increased for all of us. When she came back to the job,the time off the doctor’s visits, etc, were legendary.

I was punished by these kids of laws for NOT having any kids. Discrimination-——

IF you want to work-—then WORK——

IF you want to have kids-—then have kids.

NOT BOTH. Yes, Virginia-—you CANNOT have it all. Choose!!!

As a life long bookkeeper, I can well imagine small businesses are cringing over all these new PAID benefits for new parents. Minimum wages-—Obamacare-—now this. Iknow a number of clients I once had would fold under the weight of all these government demanded payments for getting pregnant. I also worked many jobs where there were NO health or dental benefits. IF I owned a business today & needed employees, I would pay them more & let them find their own health care. It is a never-ending nightmare to administer such benefits.

My brother had about 60 employees year around. He calculated that it took over 1 1/2 employees to do all the administration of the paperwork JUST TO HAVE THE BENEFITS ......One got paid over $75,000 a year due to the complex rules they had to follow.


127 posted on 09/14/2016 8:11:47 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson