I am kind of with her on this. He could have been taken alive; he was unarmed. Wonder why he wasn’t?
Buh bye, Jill.
Probably not since she isn’t a Navy SEAL.
You don’t assassinate , you Kill
Sounds like 2004 John Kerry — ‘terrorism is a law enforcement issue.’
He ordered the death of 3,000 on 911 and you say SO WHAT?
What an ignorant icehole.
Freegards
LEX
she would have tried to bring the terror leader to trial in accordance with international law.
And since it would have been his First Conviction, she would have recommended Probation and Community Service.
Reminds me of 1988, Dukakis talking about how he would respond to a hypothetical rape of his wife.
0bama would have pardoned him.
Bring him to trial? The motions would still be ongoing! What an idiot.
You right wing meanies just do not understand. If Jill could have brought Osama here before 9-11 she could have soothed his nerves with herbal tea and a full body toxin removing colonic treatment. They could have listened to relaxing new age music while the toxins were removed from Osama’s body. After that he wouldn’t have wanted to kill anyone. It would have been beautiful and there would now be peace everywhere in the world. /S
is it possible for anyone to get less than zero votes? if so, this Stein lady just did it!
taking terrorists alive is the exact mistake Isarel keeps making
it only gives Isarel several thousand terorists to support in jail, and then they get out and then they murder more and more innocent people
when you see a terrorist, you KILL it!
period!
protect your community, your family, your self, don’t screw around Ms. Stein. grow up and get smart and then people might just might vote for you someday
How do we know that osama is dead? Buried at sea with no pictures taken? LOTS of the people who supposedly killed him now dead themselves??
As far as I know, the only reason we DID NOT have a TRIAL for the mastermind of 9/11 - was because we would have been required TO REVEAL DETAILS OF HOW WE KNEW WHERE HE WAS, HOW WE KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT HIS MOVEMENTS, HIS ASSOCIATES, ETC.
It was very logical to remove him from living .. instead of spending hundreds of thousands of dollars in security to keep him in some kind of jail (during and after the trial) - where he could agitate others in the jail - where he could have been the target of an attempt to rescue him from jail (killing many people in the process).
THEREFORE, WHEN YOU TAKE THOSE STATS INTO CONSIDERATION; IT’S BETTER TO TAKE HIM OUT. HIS COMPOUND PROVIDED MORE THAN ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT OUR CLAIMS AGAINST HIM.
This would be my main reasoning of why I WOULD NOT VOTE FOR JILL STEIN. She is .. classically .. ignorant of the real world. There are REAL EVIL PEOPLE in the world. And, we are not obligated to treat them with kid gloves and/or kindness after they have murdered over 3,000 of our citizens.
Ms. Stein is grossly ignorant of the real world.
“...she would have tried to bring the terror leader to trial in accordance with international law.”
I suspect Jill prefers international law over American law and/or American interests.
This is good, it will pull more of Hillary’s deplorables over to Stein....
Yeah, right...and have an America-hating international court find him not guilty.
I would hate to have to order killing bin Laden. Because it would mean that I couldn’t pull the trigger on the sonofabitch personally.