Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disgrace: Hillary Clinton Shamelessly Lies While Lecturing a Navy Vet
Townhall ^ | 8 Sep 2016 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 09/08/2016 5:35:59 PM PDT by detective

Truncated title.

Full title: Disgrace: Hillary Clinton Shamelessly Lies While Lecturing a Navy Vet About Handling Classified Information

Wednesday night during NBC's Commander-in-Chief national security forum, former Secretary of State and Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was repeatedly put on the defensive over her use of multiple private email servers and her compromising of U.S. national security.

During the forum a Navy Veteran, who held a top secret compartmentalized security clearance during his service, explained to Clinton that if he had transmitted classified information in the way she did multiple times on a private system, he would have been prosecuted and imprisoned. Clearly irritated, Clinton responded by again lying about transmitting marked classified information and lectured the veteran about how classified information works.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; emails
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Clinton lies again.
1 posted on 09/08/2016 5:36:00 PM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

Hillary Clinton believes that the end justifies the means, as long as it is her ends that are being discussed.

Everyone else must dot every “I” and cross every “T”.

Mrs. Clinton would - and undoubtedly will - lie to St. Peter in her final interview, and she will feel completely justified in doing so.


2 posted on 09/08/2016 5:40:13 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

And no one asked about bengahzi


3 posted on 09/08/2016 5:47:04 PM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
"None of our people died in Libya"

WHAT PLANET IS SHE ON....?

4 posted on 09/08/2016 5:48:23 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective
I wasn't alive when they had the House On Un-American Activities, but EVERYONE has heard a trillion times about that one exasperated lib who in front of the cameras exclaimed,

"Do you at long last, sir, HAVE NO SHAME..?"

And for decades that guy has been cracked up as this huge, profound genius.

I have never really thought of him that way, but MEH..!

But seriously: We are absolutely AT THE POINT where one of our people has to do that EXACT SAME THING to Hillary.

She's freaking BEGGING for it.

5 posted on 09/08/2016 5:52:08 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Joseph Welch.


6 posted on 09/08/2016 5:55:20 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: detective

Stoopid, crooked, lesbo bitch! ...


7 posted on 09/08/2016 5:57:28 PM PDT by VRWC For Truth (FU Klintoons)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius

8 posted on 09/08/2016 6:01:22 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: detective
She also lied about using a "parallel system."

Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email Account at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules MARCH 2, 2015 New York Times

WASHINGTON — Hillary Rodham Clinton exclusively used a personal email account to conduct government business as secretary of state, State Department officials said, and may have violated federal requirements that officials’ correspondence be retained as part of the agency’s record.

Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department. Her aides took no actions to have her personal emails preserved on department servers at the time, as required by the Federal Records Act.


9 posted on 09/08/2016 6:11:33 PM PDT by TigersEye (~Putin made me post this!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

She is a TRUE psychopath.


10 posted on 09/08/2016 6:21:55 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ("WE ARE ALL OSAMA, 0BAMA!" al-Qaeda terrorists who breached the American compound in Benghazi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Anne Coulter published an explication of that incident.

Seems it was a setup by commies.

BTW, Tailgunner Joe was a senator. He wasn’t connected with the HUAC.


11 posted on 09/08/2016 6:23:00 PM PDT by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FrdmLvr

She obviously wasn’t paying attention when she was told that—as a Senate-confirmed presidential appointee, and SecState- she was an Original Classification Authority. Thus, she had the authority to classify—or declassify—anything she saw, heard, or said.

She totally abused that authority. She should be under indictment right now, not gathering millions of bucks for her “foundation.”

TC


12 posted on 09/08/2016 6:41:57 PM PDT by Pentagon Leatherneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: detective

That Navy vet could have eaten her lunch on proper handling of classified material, but they didn’t let him.


13 posted on 09/08/2016 7:32:24 PM PDT by xzins ( Free Republic Gives YOU a voice heard around the globe. Support the Freepathon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

“Clinton lies again.”

Q: How do you know Hilliary is lying?
A: She is speaking.

What I can’t believe is nobody has taken her to task for:

1) She was the top classification authority at State. That means she was responsible for recognizing classifiable information on sight and MAKING SURE IT WAS MARKED!

2) The markings on classified material are not what makes it classified. Sufficiently sensitive material is inherently classified and must be protected as such.

3) Some of the material was TS/SCI and was definitely marked as such when generated. Who removed the markings and sent that information to Hilliary? That action was clearly criminal, and I’m quite sure Hilliary was complicit.

Hilliary for Prison!


14 posted on 09/09/2016 12:59:45 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Trump/Pence 2016! Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Mrs. Clinton did not have a government email address during her four-year tenure at the State Department.

Oh, I'm sure she did.

Whether or not she used it is a different story.

15 posted on 09/09/2016 4:58:58 AM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, RINOs......same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: detective

It’s easy to

live - free - republic

DEPOPULATE liars, criminals, conman, collectivists, scumbags, socialists, tyrants, totalitarians from the body politic.


16 posted on 09/09/2016 6:12:25 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

No, it has been established multiple times that she was offered a .gov email account, encouraged to get a .gov email account, begged to get a .gov email account and she never did.


17 posted on 09/09/2016 1:11:55 PM PDT by TigersEye (~Putin made me post this!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Hillary didn’t take the protocols and penalties of the statutes on classified materials very seriously when she instructed one of her aides to scrub off the headers and warning labels of a sensitive file and send it to her via an unauthorized un-secure fax or email.

This instruction was found in one of the deleted emails. It is a smoking gun email that shows intent to break the law which proscribes this type of copying or editing to disguise classified material so that it may be passed to or via unauthorized media or persons. Even Queen Hillary.

Since a lot of unauthorized classified materials showed up in her deleted emails without headers and proper labels, then it seems fairly certain that this was not a “one-time” action. Further, it is so illegal to do that scrubbing of classified materials that her staff ought to be prosecuted as well for following her illegal instructions. There is no requirement in the Federal statutes that there be ‘intent’ to commit espionage, despite the very faulty, politically motivated, arguments of FBI Director Comey or his bosses at the DOJ.

This is worthy of a RICO criminal conspiracy prosecution which would include Comey and Lynch in my opinion.


18 posted on 09/09/2016 3:01:08 PM PDT by wildbill (If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wildbill
This is worthy of a RICO criminal conspiracy prosecution which would include Comey and Lynch in my opinion.

Agreed.

19 posted on 09/09/2016 5:08:45 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
she was...begged to get a .gov email account and she never did.

Everyone in government gets a government e-mail address.

hrclinton@state.gov

20 posted on 09/09/2016 5:32:58 PM PDT by ROCKLOBSTER (RATs, RINOs......same thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson