Feelings do not trump every citizens right to self defense.
Perhaps if he took his anger and focused it on the person and family of the murderer. You know the one with the evil intent.
If he’s so upset about his sister’s death, why isn’t he pushing lawmakers to make it illegal to kill people?
Daniel, who owns a gun, said he was shocked that his late brother-in-law was able to buy a firearm despite a judge’s order prohibiting Radcliffe from possessing one.
My rights do not end because of your loss.
“Daniel, who owns a gun, said he was shocked that his late brother-in-law was able to buy a firearm despite a judge’s order prohibiting Radcliffe from possessing one.”
Proof that those who are determined to commit murder DO NOT FOLLOW THE LAW. What makes this moron think that adding a new law would prevent a murderer from getting a gun?
Yep, taking the rights away from 300+ million people is the appropriate answer to this guy’s loss.
“But Rico, a former gang member and admitted criminal from Madison, told a reporter that he bought his guns, finding it easy to amass numerous high-powered weapons after he failed a background check by a licensed dealer. While Rico has bought some of his guns “on the street,” he also purchased weapons at gun shows. He asked that his full formal name not to be used because he described committing crimes that could subject him to prosecution.”
Sounds like a made up story and person. Why would a criminal would trust the criminal media with their name?