Is it illogical to assume that the government could use something like net neutrality to squash any online site that it doesn’t like? Especially one that pulls back the curtains?
Net neutrality, despite the corporate-egged-on-hype, has bupkis to with government deciding who says what. It was actually a plea to be protected BY the government from everyone who didn’t trust big corporations who had already been caught ‘filtering’ traffic for multiple reasons being able to literally charge more for traffic to/from website X than website Z for any reason they liked.