[TexasGator]

“My original post was about how the delay of the criminal trials is clearly in violation of the “speedy trial” clause of the Sixth Amendment and the resultant lack of action in the civil cases is a violation of the Civil Rights Act. (Denial of due process.) Did you think that by waiting a day to reply we’d all forget what the point of this was? “

Uh, the article topic is about civil vs criminal trials to which I made my comment and you reply to my comment was about speedy criminal trials which had nothing to do with my post.

Do you think that by adding your confusion that we’d all forget that you made a non-relevant post to me?

[shibumi]

The point is that your post did not address the gist of the article:

"Criminal cases have precedent over civil"

And by the way it's "precedence."
A "precedent" is a prior ruling that sets a standard.
"Precedence" is the order of priority.