To: Kaslin
It’s a shame the thread is getting off-track with discussing Gaffigan, which was not my intent.
Hey, people, the topic here is whether birth control and having fewer or no children is a beneficial act for the planet (even if it means the death of Western Civ). Basically, it’s Environmentalists vs. God’s Will.
16 posted on
08/26/2016 10:09:06 AM PDT by
Albion Wilde
("They only smear who they fear." --Diamond and Silk)
To: Albion Wilde
22 posted on
08/26/2016 10:21:10 AM PDT by
Kaslin
To: Albion Wilde
Thanks for getting us back on track. The various families of which I am a member have been doing family reunions for years. I look at those from the 60s and 70s and they are dominated by kids. Fast forward to the 90s and it is about 50-50. Now, the kids are a minority. And most of my family are Christian, conservative and great at reproducing. We had three in less than four years. We would have kept going if my wife's health had permitted.
Now that the kids are gone and we have only grandkids to look forward to growing in number, we can laugh about it and say the joys we had raising the kids was even better with the joys we had in implanting them.
28 posted on
08/26/2016 1:38:14 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(ObaMao: Fake America, Fake Messiah, Fake Black man. How many fakes can you fit into one Zer0?)
To: Albion Wilde
The goal of civilization is, at it's core, the protection of children and pregnant women.
If it goes in any other direction it dies.
36 posted on
09/25/2016 12:54:50 PM PDT by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson