Posted on 08/24/2016 5:22:42 AM PDT by SJackson
This article was originally published on Grist. This week Grist is celebrating National Parks and the humans who use them. Check out the rest of the series here.
For its first one hundred years, the National Park Service had a pretty clear agenda: preserve America’s remote wilderness wonders. The far-way, tough-to-get-to, gotta-drive-or-hike-to-it stuff. The more pristine and undisturbed, the better.
But for its next one hundred, the parks service is eyeing a whole new type of preservation: local beaches, tree-lined urban rivers, or a historic building within biking distance of downtown. Less Half Dome, more Superdome.
That’s right: The folks with trees, mountains, and bison on their badges have decided it’s high time to serve city dwellers.
Today, the park system mostly caters to the people who can afford a major road trip, and they are overwhelmingly white. One survey found that 78% of park visitors were non-Hispanic whites. That’s a problem for the Park Service, because the country’s demographics have shifted radically since it was established. The United States is an urban country, with 80% of us living in cities, and its white majority will soon be history.
The diversity of America “is not represented in the National Park Service,” the agency acknowledged in a recent report. “Indisputably, much of the success of the NPS in coming years will depend on its ability to diversify and prove its relevancy to new populations.”
“The urban agenda is really about relevancy,” said Alan Spears, cultural director of the nonprofit National Parks Conservation Association, an advocate for the parks. “It’s about creating a 21st-century park system for a 21st-century America.”
Truth be told, the National Park Service already has a pretty big foothold in cities; it’s just that these parks don’t have the same foothold in our minds. There are tons of historic sites and monuments that you can visit in big cities around the country, just as you might visit Yellowstone. There’s the African Burial Ground in lower Manhattan, the Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area running through Atlanta, and pretty much all the famous sites in Washington D.C.
The agency wants to use these sites as gateways for city dwellers, then get them out to other nearby parks, like Golden Gate National Recreation Area in San Francisco and the Santa Monica Mountains in Los Angeles.
The young Gayle Hazelwood was exactly the type of person the parks are hoping to reach with their appropriately named Urban Agenda. “Until I was 20, I didn’t know national parks existed,” she told me. Then she happened to get a summer job at Cuyahoga Valley National Park, amid the rolling hills just outside Cleveland, and learned what she was missing. Hazelwood was so bowled over by the park and the family-like welcome she received from the staff that she decided to stay put. She’s now a deputy regional director for the park service and has dedicated herself to making sure everyone gets a chance to spend part of their childhoods playing in the parks.
Early in Hazelwood’s career, she partnered with two local low-income housing agencies to introduce kids to Cuyahoga Valley. She set up a three-part class in the city for children to learn about the park and outdoor safety. Kids who attended all three sessions earned an overnight camping trip. Hazelwood said programs like these are bringing a new, diverse generation of kids into the parks.
“It really is rewarding,” Hazelwood said. “You see these kids’ eyes light up, you see that sense of wonder, you see them get to experience that welcoming, family feeling of the national parks.”
Efforts like these are expanding the appeal of national parks, said Rue Mapp, founder and CEO of Outdoor Afro, a nonprofit that — if you can’t tell from the name — gets African Americans into the outdoors. “I think that the national parks are headed in the right direction. This is really an opportunity for them to double down and become more reflective of America.”
In many ways, the National Park Service is a custodian of the way the country thinks about nature. I don’t know about you, but for me “nature” means Yosemite or the Grand Canyon — beautiful landscapes without many people. If there are visitors, they should be tiptoeing through, doing their best to leave no trace of their passing.
But this vision of nature has major problems. As the journalist Emma Marris puts it in a TED talk, by sticking to this definition, “We are stealing nature from our children.”
That is, when we define nature as pristine and distant, we are bound to make it difficult for most kids to experience it. Hew too closely to the ideal of an unsullied Eden and we’ll miss all the cool stuff that’s scurrying, fluttering, and growing close at hand.
I happen to have just written a book about urban nature, and I was astounded by how much I’d been missing. This effort to bring national parks to cities could help change the way we think about nature for everybody’s benefit. Instead of thinking that it’s beautiful and fragile, we might begin to think of nature as what surrounds us, what we live in. Sometimes, it’s the stuff we have to manipulate in order to survive. That’s a much more realistic framing.
So this campaign to make the parks more inclusive has the potential to be much more than a feel-good outreach effort. If everyone in the next generation grows up with access to to dirt trails, green fields, and wetlands pulsing with life, then maybe they will have a shot at figuring out how to live with nature on a planetary scale. That’s a legacy worth pursuing.
Mission creep.
They want to have park service jobs convenient to where they want to live.
Since they claim to be perennially short of funds, and since many of the most popular parks are overflowing during the summer, not sure just what kind of urban parks they'll be establishing. Out of over 400 units in the Park Service national parks, monuments, seashores and rivers account for about 175, the rest being mostly historical Sites, monuments, battlefields, most of which are in or near urban areas. Not neglected, though there are no national squirrel, raccoon and coyote preserves in urban areas so I suppose there's potential. I suspect this is really meant to address the low attendance by minorities at parks. Unfortunate, but it is there choice. Could make a park out of Detroit, America's Past Industrial Might National Historical Site. Perhaps Urban Crime National Historical Site in Chicago. Or should that be a Battlefield
Just another way expand gub’mint and the “King’s Land”.
I would love to see the word “diversity” banished from the modern-day lexicon.
Yellowstone is fine, but when you've seen one geyser, you've seen then all. And the feds already own more mountains than any of us could hope to climb. Looking at the funding and geographical balance, historic preservation is sadly underserved in the NPS.
The tricky issue will be coordinating with state and local park authorities. I can point to a great many sites with national historical and cultural significance that should be saved. But whether the feds or a local agency should do the job is a different issue. If a stronger federal-state partnership enhances preservation, great. If a bigger federal role induces states and localities to pull back and wait for free money from Washington, it could be counterproductive.
Mount Vernon is not a government-run site but it's near a major city and easy to get to. I was there last year. There were a lot of foreign tourists but very few black Americans. If people don't want to go, it's their loss.
Historic preservation has been part of the NPS's mandate for generations. Think Gettysburg and Antietam, and work out from there.
“city diversity”
In the brave new world we live in, “diversity” means exclusion of certain unfavored groups. You can, and maybe should, be identical and diverse at the same time.
They made the area of the old Pullman factory in Chicago a national monument last year. It’s an interesting area and probably deserves preservation. It has a place in African-American history. The neighborhood is sketchy when you get beyond the gentrified area adjacent to the monument, and the neighborhoods you pass through to get there are among the worst in the city. The day I visited, there were a handful of visitors, all of us white. Part of the monument is the interesting Pullman Porters Museum. My son, daughter-in-law, and I had the place to ourselves.
Yes
[sigh]....I guess Obama and the Democrat Party have to inject race and politics into absolutely friggin’ EVERYTHING!!
“Until I was 20, I didn’t know national parks existed,” she told me.”
Then you are a moron and no doubt a Hillary voter.
They can visit Stonewall or whatever it’s called.
The Missouri Conservation Commission used to be really solid and a pretty good steward of the state’s resources. Then they got a 1/8th percent sales tax passed by voter initiative. Now they have money coming out the wazoo to buy up land and drive up its price and promote social projects. Now they’re just another government boondoggle.
The word (and intent) is evil now.
They also want non-whites working those government jobs...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.