Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne

thanks for the information on Iraq that I did not know. But why didn’t we send half a million men in so we could secure the borders and secure the cities. 250000 man wasn’t enough. Also when you go in under the pretext of rescuing people it’s hard to turn around and kill them so easily when you occupy. we should have what soldiers and police keep their jobs. Oh well. Even if Obama had left ten thousand troops none of this mess would have happened in the past 5 years. But there’s no use looking back.


9 posted on 08/23/2016 11:15:10 AM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: dp0622

We didn’t send in half a million men, because we didn’t have half a million men. We had already allowed our military to be decimated, and it has been more-so since.

By the time Obama became president, the situation was well in hand. He abandoned it, and allow Iraq to be over-run by our enemies.

If the war had been run perfectly, we would have lost far fewer men, and had far fewer injuries. Hindsight is always 20/20. It’s too bad Bush didn’t adjust his plan earlier, but he did and things turned out quite good actually. And then Obama...

One of Bush’s biggest mistakes was not drawing a line in the sand on Iran. He allow it to train, arm, and send in terrorists to Iraq and did very little about it.


10 posted on 08/23/2016 12:00:17 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson