A Hillary presidency could well trigger a violent revolution.
That is why Mr. Trump MUST WIN because if Hillary wins it is certain.
>>>A Hillary presidency could well trigger a violent revolution.<<<
This is the wet dream of the left. They want this outcome as a way to both get rid of their enemies, permanently, and expand their power to the point of being total.
Ayn Rand provides us with an alternative vision of dealing with the bureaucratic uberstate, though. A general strike by the productive, without the shouting and displays of the left, but done privately, quietly, and without leadership, is certain to collapse the system. Yes, the state can coerce and even kill you, but it can’t force you to work hard and with enthusiasm. Cloward-Piven in reverse, underwhelming the system so it never has the resources to fully implement its plans.
And I don’t want to get into the weeds with Ayn’s more nutty ideas and values. The silent general strike is a potent weapon in this situation. Asymmetrical warfare at its finest. Not necessarily a monkish withdrawal from the world, but instead a dispassionate observation from the sidelines. Directly fighting these people, though, is certainly what they want.
Of course, if Trump wins, then the game is changed, as we’ll see where that heads.